Literature DB >> 26948696

Protein side chain conformation predictions with an MMGBSA energy function.

Thomas Gaillard1, Nicolas Panel1, Thomas Simonson1.   

Abstract

The prediction of protein side chain conformations from backbone coordinates is an important task in structural biology, with applications in structure prediction and protein design. It is a difficult problem due to its combinatorial nature. We study the performance of an "MMGBSA" energy function, implemented in our protein design program Proteus, which combines molecular mechanics terms, a Generalized Born and Surface Area (GBSA) solvent model, with approximations that make the model pairwise additive. Proteus is not a competitor to specialized side chain prediction programs due to its cost, but it allows protein design applications, where side chain prediction is an important step and MMGBSA an effective energy model. We predict the side chain conformations for 18 proteins. The side chains are first predicted individually, with the rest of the protein in its crystallographic conformation. Next, all side chains are predicted together. The contributions of individual energy terms are evaluated and various parameterizations are compared. We find that the GB and SA terms, with an appropriate choice of the dielectric constant and surface energy coefficients, are beneficial for single side chain predictions. For the prediction of all side chains, however, errors due to the pairwise additive approximation overcome the improvement brought by these terms. We also show the crucial contribution of side chain minimization to alleviate the rigid rotamer approximation. Even without GB and SA terms, we obtain accuracies comparable to SCWRL4, a specialized side chain prediction program. In particular, we obtain a better RMSD than SCWRL4 for core residues (at a higher cost), despite our simpler rotamer library. Proteins 2016; 84:803-819.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generalized Born; computational protein design; molecular mechanics; side chain placement; surface area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948696     DOI: 10.1002/prot.25030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Computational Design of PDZ-Peptide Binding.

Authors:  Nicolas Panel; Francesco Villa; Vaitea Opuu; David Mignon; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  2-Methoxyestradiol Affects Mitochondrial Biogenesis Pathway and Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Flavoprotein Subunit A in Osteosarcoma Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Magdalena Gorska-Ponikowska; Alicja Kuban-Jankowska; Stephan A Eisler; Ugo Perricone; Giosuè Lo Bosco; Giampaolo Barone; Stephan Nussberger
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 3.  Step-by-step design of proteins for small molecule interaction: A review on recent milestones.

Authors:  José M Pereira; Maria Vieira; Sérgio M Santos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Evaluation of new antihypertensive drugs designed in silico using Thermolysin as a target.

Authors:  Desmond MacLeod-Carey; Eduardo Solis-Céspedes; Emilio Lamazares; Karel Mena-Ulecia
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Adaptive landscape flattening allows the design of both enzyme: Substrate binding and catalytic power.

Authors:  Vaitea Opuu; Giuliano Nigro; Thomas Gaillard; Emmanuelle Schmitt; Yves Mechulam; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 6.  Molecular Structure, Binding Affinity, and Biological Activity in the Epigenome.

Authors:  Balázs Zoltán Zsidó; Csaba Hetényi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.