Literature DB >> 2694860

Assessing the position of the tracheal tube. The reliability of different methods.

K H Andersen1, A Hald.   

Abstract

Various methods have been developed to confirm proper intubation of the trachea. This blind, randomised study evaluates some of these quantitatively and qualitatively. Forty patients had both their trachea and oesophagus intubated. A procedure that included auscultation of the upper abdomen and lungs was 100% reliable independent of which tube was ventilated. Auscultation of the lungs resulted in a wrong conclusion in 15% (6-30, 95% confidence limits) of the cases when the oesophagus was ventilated: the sounds were misinterpretated as normal breath sounds. Suction on the tubes with a 60-ml syringe was also a reliable test. Other methods assessed were observation for condensation of water vapor, and abnormal movements of the upper abdomen; these were unreliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2694860     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  4 in total

Review 1.  Emergency management of the airway outside the operating room.

Authors:  D L Bogdonoff; D J Stone
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Management of the upper airway.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

3.  Prehospital determination of tracheal tube placement in severe head injury.

Authors:  S Grmec; S Mally
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.