Literature DB >> 26948414

Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens.

Patnapa Vejanurug1, Poohglin Tresukosol1, Praneet Sajjachareonpong1, Pailin Puangpet1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2003, the EU Cosmetics Directive stated that 26 fragrance substances must be listed on the cosmetic product ingredient labels. Not all of these 26 fragrance substances are detected by the usual screening markers comprising fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II, and Myroxylon pereirae.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of testing with the 26 individual fragrance substances in addition to the standard fragrance screening markers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and twelve consecutive patients were patch tested with our baseline series and the 26 specific fragrance substances required to be declared on cosmetic product ingredient labels in accordance with the EU Cosmetics Directive.
RESULTS: Positive reactions to at least either one of the 26 individual fragrance substances or the usual fragrance screening markers were seen in 84 of 312 patients (26.9%). Fifteen of these 84 patients (17.8%) reacted negatively to the fragrance screening markers. The most common individual fragrance allergens were cinnamyl alcohol (11.2%), cinnamal (9%), and hydroxycitronellal (3.8%). Sixty-two of 312 patients (19.8%) had at least one positive reaction to the fragrance screening markers.
CONCLUSION: Additional patch testing with the 26 individual fragrance allergens, or with the commonest fragrance allergens identified within these 26, should be performed to optimize the detection of fragrance allergy. Cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamal are important fragrance allergens in Thailand.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  26 labelled fragrances; allergic contact dermatitis; fragrances

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948414     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  3 in total

Review 1.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  What is the added value of patch testing with 30 fragrance allergens in addition to the European Baseline series?

Authors:  Rosalie C Krijl; Norbertus A Ipenburg; Sylvie M Franken; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.419

3.  Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes: An update from southern Sweden.

Authors:  Thanisorn Sukakul; Magnus Bruze; Martin Mowitz; Annarita Antelmi; Waranya Boonchai; Jakob Dahlin; Nils Hamnerius; Inese Hauksson; Tina Lejding; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.