| Literature DB >> 26948409 |
Saskia Lüde1, Sarah Vecchio2, Sandra Sinno-Tellier3, Aymeric Dopter4, Harriet Mustonen5, Slavica Vucinic6, Birgitta Jonsson7, Dieter Müller8, Ligia Veras Gimenez Fruchtengarten9, Karl Hruby10, Elizabeth De Souza Nascimento11, Chiara Di Lorenzo12, Patrizia Restani12, Hugo Kupferschmidt1, Alessandro Ceschi1,13,14.
Abstract
Plant food supplements (PFS) are products of increasing popularity and wide-spread distribution. Nevertheless, information about their risks is limited. To fill this gap, a poisons centres-based study was performed as part of the EU project PlantLIBRA. Multicentre retrospective review of data from selected European and Brazilian poisons centres, involving human cases of adverse effects due to plants consumed as food or as ingredients of food supplements recorded between 2006 and 2010. Ten poisons centres provided a total of 75 cases. In 57 cases (76%) a PFS was involved; in 18 (24%) a plant was ingested as food. The 10 most frequently reported plants were Valeriana officinalis, Camellia sinensis, Paullinia cupana, Melissa officinalis, Passiflora incarnata, Mentha piperita, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Ilex paraguariensis, Panax ginseng, and Citrus aurantium. The most frequently observed clinical effects were neurotoxicity and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Most cases showed a benign clinical course; however, five cases were severe. PFS-related adverse effects seem to be relatively infrequent issues for poisons centres. Most cases showed mild symptoms. Nevertheless, the occurrence of some severe adverse effects and the increasing popularity of PFS require continuous active surveillance, and further research is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: adverse reactions; botanicals; nutritional supplements; plants; poisons centres; toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26948409 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytother Res ISSN: 0951-418X Impact factor: 5.878