Literature DB >> 26948080

Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.

Loubna Shamseddine1, Rola Mortada2, Khaldoun Rifai3, Jose Johann Chidiac4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the influence of the wax fabrication technique on the internal adaptation and marginal accuracy of pressed ceramic single crowns.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate crown fabricated either from conventional waxing or from a subtractive milled wax pattern.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten silicone impressions were made for a maxillary canine prepared to receive a complete crown. Two pressed lithium disilicate glass ceramic copings were made on the die poured from each impression. The first was from a conventional wax pattern and the second from milled wax blocks. The replica technique was used to measure the fit by scanning electron microscope at ×80 magnification. Collected data were analyzed with the paired Student t test for the marginal and wall fit. For the occlusal fit, the difference in scores did not follow a normal distribution, and the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used (α=.05).
RESULTS: The mean values +SD were 170.3 ±50.7 μm for the marginal fit and 130.3 ±21.6 μm for the internal fit with the conventional technique. For the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technique, they were 105.1 ±39.6 μm and 98.1 ±26.1 μm. Statistical significance was found for the marginal and internal fit (P<.05). The occlusal fit median and interval interquartile scores were 305.0 μm (269.9 to 334.4) for conventional fabrication and 199.0 μm (141.5 to 269.9) for subtractive manufacturing. The differences were not statistically significant (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The subtractive CAD-CAM waxing technique resulted in the improved fit of a pressed lithium disilicate crown by decreasing the marginal discrepancies and internal adaptation.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948080     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of Inlays Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques: A Stereomicroscopic Study.

Authors:  Anamika Sharma; Dax Abraham; Alpa Gupita; Arundeep Singh; Naresh Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Marginal Fit of Temporary Restorations Fabricated by the Conventional Chairside Method, 3D Printing, and Milling.

Authors:  Mahsa Mohajeri; Sara Khazaei; Fariborz Vafaee; Farnaz Firouz; Somayeh Ghorbani Gholiabad; Arash Shisheian
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-09-05

3.  In Vitro Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Copings Fabricated by One CAD/CAM System with Two Different Scanners.

Authors:  Zahra Khamverdi; Elmira Najafrad; Maryam Farhadian
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-01-20

4.  Effect of Different Wax Pattern Manufacturing Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns.

Authors:  Huda Ahmed Alshehri; Sara Mohammed Altaweel; Raghdah Alshaibani; Esraa Ahmed Alahmari; Hanan Nejer Alotaibi; Afnan Fouzan Alfouzan; Nawaf Labban
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.748

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.