STUDY OBJECTIVE: A 2-hour accelerated diagnostic pathway based on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score, ECG, and troponin measures (ADAPT-ADP) increased early discharge of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction presenting to the emergency department compared with standard care (from 11% to 19.3%). Observational studies suggest that an accelerated diagnostic pathway using the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS-ADP) may further increase this proportion. This trial tests for the existence and size of any beneficial effect of using the EDACS-ADP in routine clinical care. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of adults with suspected acute myocardial infarction, comparing the ADAPT-ADP and the EDACS-ADP. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged to outpatient care within 6 hours of attendance, without subsequent major adverse cardiac event within 30 days. RESULTS:Five hundred fifty-eight patients were recruited, 279 in each arm. Sixty-six patients (11.8%) had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (ADAPT-ADP 29; EDACS-ADP 37); 11.1% more patients (95% confidence interval 2.8% to 19.4%) were identified as low risk in EDACS-ADP (41.6%) than in ADAPT-ADP (30.5%). No low-risk patients had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (0.0% [0.0% to 1.9%]). There was no difference in the primary outcome of proportion discharged within 6 hours (EDACS-ADP 32.3%; ADAPT-ADP 34.4%; difference -2.1% [-10.3% to 6.0%], P=.65). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the proportion of patients discharged early despite more patients being classified as low risk by the EDACS-ADP than the ADAPT-ADP. Both accelerated diagnostic pathways are effective strategies for chest pain assessment and resulted in an increased rate of early discharges compared with previously reported rates.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: A 2-hour accelerated diagnostic pathway based on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score, ECG, and troponin measures (ADAPT-ADP) increased early discharge of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction presenting to the emergency department compared with standard care (from 11% to 19.3%). Observational studies suggest that an accelerated diagnostic pathway using the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS-ADP) may further increase this proportion. This trial tests for the existence and size of any beneficial effect of using the EDACS-ADP in routine clinical care. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of adults with suspected acute myocardial infarction, comparing the ADAPT-ADP and the EDACS-ADP. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged to outpatient care within 6 hours of attendance, without subsequent major adverse cardiac event within 30 days. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients were recruited, 279 in each arm. Sixty-six patients (11.8%) had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (ADAPT-ADP 29; EDACS-ADP 37); 11.1% more patients (95% confidence interval 2.8% to 19.4%) were identified as low risk in EDACS-ADP (41.6%) than in ADAPT-ADP (30.5%). No low-risk patients had a major adverse cardiac event within 30 days (0.0% [0.0% to 1.9%]). There was no difference in the primary outcome of proportion discharged within 6 hours (EDACS-ADP 32.3%; ADAPT-ADP 34.4%; difference -2.1% [-10.3% to 6.0%], P=.65). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the proportion of patients discharged early despite more patients being classified as low risk by the EDACS-ADP than the ADAPT-ADP. Both accelerated diagnostic pathways are effective strategies for chest pain assessment and resulted in an increased rate of early discharges compared with previously reported rates.
Authors: Peter A Kavsak; Johannes T Neumann; Louise Cullen; Martin Than; Colleen Shortt; Jaimi H Greenslade; John W Pickering; Francisco Ojeda; Jinhui Ma; Natasha Clayton; Jonathan Sherbino; Stephen A Hill; Matthew McQueen; Dirk Westermann; Nils A Sörensen; William A Parsonage; Lauren Griffith; Shamir R Mehta; P J Devereaux; Mark Richards; Richard Troughton; Chris Pemberton; Sally Aldous; Stefan Blankenberg; Andrew Worster Journal: CMAJ Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: John W Pickering; Joanna M Young; Peter M George; Antony S Watson; Sally J Aldous; Richard W Troughton; Christopher J Pemberton; A Mark Richards; Louise A Cullen; Martin P Than Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Peter S Pang; Gregory J Fermann; Benton R Hunter; Phillip D Levy; Kathleen A Lane; Xiaochun Li; Mette Cole; Sean P Collins Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Murat Arslan; Jeroen Schaap; Pleunie P M Rood; Koen Nieman; Ricardo P J Budde; Bas M van Dalen; Mohamed Attrach; Eric A Dubois; Admir Dedic Journal: Cardiology Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 1.869
Authors: Atul Anand; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Amy V Ferry; Phil D Adamson; Fiona E Strachan; Colin Berry; Iain Findlay; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; David A McAllister; Donogh Maguire; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Chris Tuck; Ronald Harkess; Catriona Keerie; Christopher J Weir; Richard A Parker; Alasdair Gray; Anoop S V Shah; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Richard Body; Charles Boachie; Alex McConnachie; Simon Carley; Patricia Van Den Berg; Fiona E Lecky Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Edward Watts Carlton; John William Pickering; Jaimi Greenslade; Louise Cullen; Martin Than; Jason Kendall; Richard Body; William A Parsonage; Ahmed Khattab; Kim Greaves Journal: Heart Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Edward Carlton; Sarah Campbell; Jenny Ingram; Rebecca Kandiyali; Hazel Taylor; Shahid Aziz; Peter Beresford; Jason Kendall; Adam Reuben; Jason Smith; Patricia Jane Vickery; Jonathan Richard Benger Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: W Frank Peacock; Robert Christenson; Deborah B Diercks; Christian Fromm; Gary F Headden; Christopher J Hogan; Erik B Kulstad; Frank LoVecchio; Richard M Nowak; Jon W Schrock; Adam J Singer; Alan B Storrow; Joely Straseski; Alan H B Wu; Daniel P Zelinski Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 3.451