Literature DB >> 26947602

Exploratory Decision-Tree Modeling of Data from the Randomized REACTT Trial of Tadalafil Versus Placebo to Predict Recovery of Erectile Function After Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.

Francesco Montorsi1, Matthias Oelke2, Carsten Henneges3, Gerald Brock4, Andrea Salonia5, Gianluca d'Anzeo6, Andrea Rossi6, John P Mulhall7, Hartwig Büttner8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding predictors for the recovery of erectile function (EF) after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP) might help clinicians and patients in preoperative counseling and expectation management of EF rehabilitation strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of potential predictors on EF recovery after nsRP by post hoc decision-tree modeling of data from A Study of Tadalafil After Radical Prostatectomy (REACTT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized double-blind double-dummy placebo-controlled trial in 423 men aged <68 yr with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Gleason ≤7, normal preoperative EF) who underwent nsRP at 50 centers from nine European countries and Canada. INTERVENTION: Postsurgery 1:1:1 randomization to 9-mo double-blind treatment with tadalafil 5mg once a day (OaD), tadalafil 20mg on demand, or placebo, followed by a 6-wk drug-free-washout, and a 3-mo open-label tadalafil OaD treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Three decision-tree models, using the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score at the end of double-blind treatment, washout, and open-label treatment as response variable. Each model evaluated the association between potential predictors: presurgery IIEF domain and IIEF single-item scores, surgical approach, nerve-sparing score (NSS), and postsurgery randomized treatment group. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The first decision-tree model (n=422, intention-to-treat population) identified high presurgery sexual desire (IIEF item 12: ≥3.5 and <3.5) as the key predictor for IIEF-EF at the end of double-blind treatment (mean IIEF-EF: 14.9 and 11.1), followed by high confidence to get and maintain an erection (IIEF item 15: ≥3.5 and <3.5; IIEF-EF: 15.4 and 7.1). For patients meeting these criteria, additional non-IIEF-related predictors included robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (yes or no; IIEF-EF: 19.3 and 12.6), quality of nerve sparing (NSS: <2.5 and ≥2.5; IIEF-EF: 14.3 and 10.5), and treatment with tadalafil OaD (yes and no; IIEF-EF: 17.6 and 14.3). Additional analyses after washout and open-label treatment identified high presurgery intercourse satisfaction as the key predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory decision-tree analyses identified high presurgery sexual desire, confidence, and intercourse satisfaction as key predictors for EF recovery. Patients meeting these criteria might benefit the most from conserving surgery and early postsurgery EF rehabilitation. Strategies for improving EF after surgery should be discussed preoperatively with all patients; this information may support expectation management for functional recovery on an individual patient level. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Understanding how patient characteristics and different treatment options affect the recovery of erectile function (EF) after radical surgery for prostate cancer might help physicians select the optimal treatment for their patients. This analysis of data from a clinical trial suggested that high presurgery sexual desire, sexual confidence, and intercourse satisfaction are key factors predicting EF recovery. Patients meeting these criteria might benefit the most from conserving surgery (robot-assisted surgery, perfect nerve sparing) and postsurgery medical rehabilitation of EF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01026818.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Decision-tree analysis; Erectile dysfunction; Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy; Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; Predictors; Prostate cancer; Rehabilitation; Tadalafil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26947602      PMCID: PMC5478190          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  24 in total

1.  Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Clovis T Pereira Fraga; Filippo Annino; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Adriano A Calado; Camille Mugnier
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Effect of surgical approach on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: an evaluation utilising data from a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy multicentre trial of tadalafil vs placebo.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Markus Graefen; Christian Kriegel; Uwe Michl; Antonio Martin Morales; Peter J Pommerville; Martina Manning; Hartwig Büttner; Carsten Henneges; Martin Schostak
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Umberto Capitanio; Manuela Tutolo; Marco Bianchi; Niccolò Passoni; Andrea Salonia; Renzo Colombo; Valerio Di Girolamo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function.

Authors:  J C Cappelleri; R C Rosen; M D Smith; A Mishra; I H Osterloh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.

Authors:  Eva Haglind; Stefan Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Anna Wallerstedt; Ulrica Wilderäng; Thordis Thorsteinsdottir; Mikael Lagerkvist; Jan-Erik Damber; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Peter Wiklund; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Simonetta Fracalanza; Carolina D'Elia; Silvia Secco; Massimo Iafrate; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  A phase 3, placebo controlled study of the safety and efficacy of avanafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  John P Mulhall; Arthur L Burnett; Run Wang; Kevin T McVary; Judd W Moul; Charles H Bowden; Karen DiDonato; Winnie Shih; Wesley W Day
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Padma-Nathan; A R McCullough; L A Levine; L I Lipshultz; R Siegel; F Montorsi; F Giuliano; G Brock
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Gerald Brock; Jay Lee; JoAnn Shapiro; Hendrik Van Poppel; Markus Graefen; Christian Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Likelihood of tadalafil-associated adverse events in integrated multiclinical trial database: classification tree analysis in men with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Gerald Brock; Sidney Glina; Ignacio Moncada; Steven Watts; Lei Xu; Anne Wolka; Vladimir Kopernicky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Yangchang Zhang; Fuxun Zhang; Changjing Wu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 3.  PDE-5 inhibitors should be used post radical prostatectomy as erection function rehabilitation? | Opinion: Yes.

Authors:  Laith M Alzweri; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  Erectile Dysfunction: A Primer for in Office Management.

Authors:  Samir Sami; Noah Stern; Andrew Di Pierdomenico; Brandon Katz; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 5.  Molecular Mechanisms and Current Pharmacotherapy of Peyronie's Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Fuxun Zhang; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Andrea Salonia; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.