Literature DB >> 26947435

Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.

Lateefa O AlDakhil1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of a bad outcome, injury or death of a patient during treatment increases the chance of malpractice litigation, increases legal responsibility and leads to increased fees for malpractice insurance. Physicians practicing obstetrics and gynecology face among the highest risks of malpractice litigation, and such litigation has led to an increase in the practice of defensive medicine and has made this specialty less appealing. Previous clinical data from Saudi Arabia have shown that more malpractice litigation concerns claims in obstetrics and gynecology than claims in any other field of medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the main causes of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) professional liability claims in Saudi Arabia to have a better understanding and management of risks.
METHODS: All OBGYN claims opened in Saudi Arabia between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed to identify the most common causes of claims. The results of these claims and the times until a final judgment made were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 463 malpractice claims that were closed during the study period, 114 (24.6%) claims were in obstetrics and gynecology, and 92 (80.7%) of these claims concerned complications related to delivery room events. The most common causes of obstetric malpractice litigation were shoulder dystocia (brachial plexus injury) and fetal distress (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy). Urinary system injury was the most common cause of gynecology cases. Most cases were decided in favor of the defendants with the exception of cases for which maternal and/or fetal death was the cause of litigation; nearly all of those cases were decided against the defendants.
CONCLUSION: Obstetricians face a high risk of malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia, although most claims do not end in payments to plaintiffs. However, the effects of such claims on obstetric care should not be underestimated. Adherence to standards of care and careful documentation may decrease litigation and the number of indefensible malpractice claims.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Documentation; Hospital litigation; Malpractice; Obstetric and gynecologic claims

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26947435     DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med        ISSN: 1752-928X            Impact factor:   1.614


  3 in total

1.  The attitudes towards defensive medicine among physicians of obstetrics and gynaecology in China: a questionnaire survey in a national congress.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Lei Li; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ureteric Injury During Gynaecological Surgery - Lessons from 20 Cases in Canada.

Authors:  G P Jacob; G A Vilos; F Al Turki; G Bhangav; B Abu-Rafea; A G Vilos; A Ternamian
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-05-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.