| Literature DB >> 26946302 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The compressed sensing (CS) of acceleration data has been drawing increasing attention in gait telemonitoring application. In such application, there still exist some challenging issues including high energy consumption of body-worn device for acceleration data acquisition and the poor reconstruction performance due to nonsparsity of acceleration data. Thus, the novel scheme of compressive sensing of acceleration data is needed urgently for solutions that are found to these issues.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26946302 PMCID: PMC4779586 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0142-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Block diagram of compressive sensing of acceleration data for gait telemonitoring
Fig. 2Results of NMSE versus d for different CRs
Fig. 3Results of NMSE versus CRs for three different measurement matrices
Fig. 4Results of SNR versus M
Fig. 5Results of Pearson correlation coefficient versus M
Performance comparison between different reconstruction algorithms
| Reconstruction algorithms | SNR (dB) | Reconstruction time (s) | CR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMP | 37 | 0.0078 | 50 |
| BP | 48 | 0.6363 | 50 |
| SP | 37 | 0.0079 | 50 |
| SL0 | 52 | 0.2465 | 50 |
| DGS | 51 | 0.0780 | 50 |
| Group Lasso | 55 | 0.0875 | 50 |
| SOMP | 59 | 0.0796 | 50 |
| BSBL-BO | 70 | 0.6412 | 50 |
The best prediction results from classification models with all reconstruction algorithms
| Reconstruction algorithms | Classification models | Prediction results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC (%) | Upstairs | Downstairs | ||||
| Sen (%) | Spe (%) | Sen (%) | Spe (%) | |||
| OMP | KStar | 62.5 | 60.9 | 64.7 | 64.7 | 60.9 |
| SVM | 65 | 60 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 60 | |
| MLP | 67.5 | 65.2 | 70.6 | 70.6 | 65.2 | |
| BP | KStar | 67.5 | 65.2 | 70.6 | 70.6 | 65.2 |
| SVM | 70 | 65.4 | 78.6 | 78.6 | 65.4 | |
| MLP | 72.5 | 73.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 74.7 | |
| SP | KStar | 55 | 87.5 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 87.5 |
| SVM | 62.5 | 60.9 | 64.7 | 64.7 | 60.9 | |
| MLP | 65 | 62.5 | 68.8 | 68.8 | 62.5 | |
| SL0 | KStar | 70 | 65.4 | 78.6 | 78.6 | 65.4 |
| SVM | 72.5 | 69.6 | 76.5 | 76.5 | 69.6 | |
| MLP | 75 | 67.9 | 91.7 | 91.7 | 67.9 | |
| DGS | KStar | 67.5 | 66.7 | 68.4 | 68.4 | 66.7 |
| SVM | 72.5 | 69.6 | 76.5 | 76.5 | 69.6 | |
| MLP | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | |
| Group Lasso | KStar | 72.5 | 69.6 | 76.5 | 76.5 | 69.6 |
| SVM | 75 | 72.7 | 77.9 | 77.9 | 72.7 | |
| MLP | 77.5 | 72 | 86.7 | 86.7 | 72 | |
| SOMP | KStar | 77.5 | 76.5 | 79 | 79 | 76.2 |
| SVM | 85 | 79.2 | 93.8 | 93.8 | 79.2 | |
| MLP | 87.5 | 85.7 | 89.5 | 89.5 | 85.7 | |
| BSBL-BO | KStar | 80 | 82.6 | 94.1 | 94.1 | 82.6 |
| SVM | 92.5 | 90.5 | 94.7 | 94.7 | 90.5 | |
| MLP | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | |
The confusion table for classification of seven different gait patterns
| Walk forward | Walk left | Walk right | Go up-stairs | Go down-stairs | Run | Sitting | Total | Recall (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walk forward | 125 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 89 |
| Walk left | 6 | 125 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 89 |
| Walk right | 2 | 3 | 134 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 96 |
| Go up-stairs | 10 | 6 | 3 | 116 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 83 |
| Go up-stairs | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 127 | 1 | 0 | 140 | 91 |
| Run | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 136 | 0 | 140 | 97 |
| Sitting | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 138 | 140 | 99 |
| Total | 145 | 142 | 148 | 128 | 140 | 138 | 139 | ||
| Recall (%) | 86 | 88 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 98 | 98 |