Abigail N Turner1, Patricia Carr Reese2, Pai Lien Chen3, Cynthia Kwok3, Rebecca D Jackson4, Mark A Klebanoff5, Raina N Fichorova6, Tsungai Chipato7, Charles S Morrison3. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: ant@osumc.edu. 2. School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 3. Department of Clinical and Epidemiologic Sciences, FHI360, Durham, NC. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, and The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 6. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 7. University of Zimbabwe-University of California, San Francisco, Collaborative Research Programme and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis, a highly prevalent vaginal condition, is correlated with many adverse reproductive outcomes. In some studies, low vitamin D status (measured as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25[OH]D) has been associated with increased prevalence of bacterial vaginosis. OBJECTIVES: We examined the cross-sectional association between vitamin D status and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, separately for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Using prospectively collected data, we also characterized the effect of time-varying vitamin D status on incident bacterial vaginosis. STUDY DESIGN: We quantified 25(OH)D in stored sera collected quarterly from 571 Zimbabwean women participating in the Hormonal Contraception and Risk of HIV Acquisition Study. The analysis was restricted to women not using hormonal contraception. We characterized associations between vitamin D insufficiency (defined as 25[OH]D ≤ 30 ng/mL vs > 30 ng/mL) and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among nonpregnant women at the enrollment visit and among pregnant women at the first follow-up visit that pregnancy was detected. Among women who were negative for bacterial vaginosis at enrollment (n = 380), we also assessed the effect of time-varying vitamin D status on incident bacterial vaginosis. We used the Liaison 25(OH)D total assay to measure 25(OH)D. Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed via Nugent score. RESULTS: At enrollment, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 31% and overall median 25(OH)D was 29.80 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.70-34.30 ng/mL): 29.75 ng/mL (interquartile range, 25.15-33.95 ng/mL) among women with bacterial vaginosis, and 29.90 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.70-34.50 ng/mL) among women without bacterial vaginosis. Among pregnant women, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 27% and overall median 25(OH)D was 29.90 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.10-34.00 ng/mL): 30.80 ng/mL (interquartile range, 26.10-36.90 ng/mL) among women with bacterial vaginosis, and 29.10 ng/mL (interquartile range, 23.80-33.45 ng/mL) among women without bacterial vaginosis. Vitamin D levels ≤ 30 ng/mL were not associated with a prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.34) or pregnant women (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.54). Vitamin D levels ≤ 30 ng/mL were similarly not associated with incident bacterial vaginosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.31). Our findings were robust to alternative specifications of vitamin D status including using a cut point for vitamin D deficiency of < 20 ng/mL vs ≥ 20 ng/mL and modeling 25(OH)D as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION: Among reproductive-age Zimbabwean women, insufficient vitamin D was not associated with increased bacterial vaginosis prevalence or incidence. Given established associations between bacterial vaginosis and poor reproductive outcomes, identification of factors leading to high bacterial vaginosis prevalence is urgently needed.
BACKGROUND:Bacterial vaginosis, a highly prevalent vaginal condition, is correlated with many adverse reproductive outcomes. In some studies, low vitamin D status (measured as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25[OH]D) has been associated with increased prevalence of bacterial vaginosis. OBJECTIVES: We examined the cross-sectional association between vitamin D status and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, separately for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Using prospectively collected data, we also characterized the effect of time-varying vitamin D status on incident bacterial vaginosis. STUDY DESIGN: We quantified 25(OH)D in stored sera collected quarterly from 571 Zimbabwean women participating in the Hormonal Contraception and Risk of HIV Acquisition Study. The analysis was restricted to women not using hormonal contraception. We characterized associations between vitamin Dinsufficiency (defined as 25[OH]D ≤ 30 ng/mL vs > 30 ng/mL) and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among nonpregnant women at the enrollment visit and among pregnant women at the first follow-up visit that pregnancy was detected. Among women who were negative for bacterial vaginosis at enrollment (n = 380), we also assessed the effect of time-varying vitamin D status on incident bacterial vaginosis. We used the Liaison 25(OH)D total assay to measure 25(OH)D. Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed via Nugent score. RESULTS: At enrollment, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 31% and overall median 25(OH)D was 29.80 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.70-34.30 ng/mL): 29.75 ng/mL (interquartile range, 25.15-33.95 ng/mL) among women with bacterial vaginosis, and 29.90 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.70-34.50 ng/mL) among women without bacterial vaginosis. Among pregnant women, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 27% and overall median 25(OH)D was 29.90 ng/mL (interquartile range, 24.10-34.00 ng/mL): 30.80 ng/mL (interquartile range, 26.10-36.90 ng/mL) among women with bacterial vaginosis, and 29.10 ng/mL (interquartile range, 23.80-33.45 ng/mL) among women without bacterial vaginosis. Vitamin D levels ≤ 30 ng/mL were not associated with a prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.34) or pregnant women (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.54). Vitamin D levels ≤ 30 ng/mL were similarly not associated with incident bacterial vaginosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.31). Our findings were robust to alternative specifications of vitamin D status including using a cut point for vitamin D deficiency of < 20 ng/mL vs ≥ 20 ng/mL and modeling 25(OH)D as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION: Among reproductive-age Zimbabwean women, insufficientvitamin D was not associated with increased bacterial vaginosis prevalence or incidence. Given established associations between bacterial vaginosis and poor reproductive outcomes, identification of factors leading to high bacterial vaginosis prevalence is urgently needed.
Authors: Catriona Susan Bradshaw; Anna N Morton; Suzanne M Garland; Margaret B Morris; Lorna M Moss; Christopher K Fairley Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Charles S Morrison; Barbra A Richardson; Francis Mmiro; Tsungai Chipato; David D Celentano; Joanne Luoto; Roy Mugerwa; Nancy Padian; Sungwal Rugpao; Joelle M Brown; Peter Cornelisse; Robert A Salata Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Kevin A Stoner; Seth D Reighard; Rodolfo D Vicetti Miguel; Douglas Landsittel; Lisa A Cosentino; Jeffrey A Kant; Thomas L Cherpes Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Audrey L French; Oluwatoyin M Adeyemi; Denis M Agniel; Charlesnika T Evans; Michael T Yin; Kathryn Anastos; Mardge H Cohen Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Carol L Wagner; Rebecca B McNeil; Donna D Johnson; Thomas C Hulsey; Myla Ebeling; Christopher Robinson; Stuart A Hamilton; Bruce W Hollis Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Anne L Dunlop; Sheila L Jordan; Erin P Ferranti; Cherie C Hill; Shiven Patel; Li Hao; Elizabeth J Corwin; Vin Tangpricha Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-01-01
Authors: Susan Tuddenham; Khalil G Ghanem; Laura E Caulfield; Alisha J Rovner; Courtney Robinson; Rupak Shivakoti; Ryan Miller; Anne Burke; Catherine Murphy; Jacques Ravel; Rebecca M Brotman Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 3.223