Literature DB >> 26945441

Can early hepatic fibrosis stages be discriminated by combining ultrasonic parameters?

Razika Bouzitoune1, Mahmoud Meziri2, Christiano Bittencourt Machado3, Frédéric Padilla4, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque Pereira5.   

Abstract

In this study, we put forward a new approach to classify early stages of fibrosis based on a multiparametric characterization using backscatter ultrasonic signals. Ultrasonic parameters, such as backscatter coefficient (Bc), speed of sound (SoS), attenuation coefficient (Ac), mean scatterer spacing (MSS), and spectral slope (SS), have shown their potential to differentiate between healthy and pathologic samples in different organs (eye, breast, prostate, liver). Recently, our group looked into the characterization of stages of hepatic fibrosis using the parameters cited above. The results showed that none of them could individually distinguish between the different stages. Therefore, we explored a multiparametric approach by combining these parameters in two and three, to test their potential to discriminate between the stages of liver fibrosis: F0 (normal), F1, F3, and/without F4 (cirrhosis), according to METAVIR Score. Discriminant analysis showed that the most relevant individual parameter was Bc, followed by SoS, SS, MSS, and Ac. The combination of (Bc, SoS) along with the four stages was the best in differentiating between the stages of fibrosis and correctly classified 85% of the liver samples with a high level of significance (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, when taking into account only stages F0, F1, and F3, the discriminant analysis showed that the parameters (Bc, SoS) and (Bc, Ac) had a better classification (93%) with a high level of significance (p<0.0001). The combination of the three parameters (Bc, SoS, and Ac) led to a 100% correct classification. In conclusion, the current findings show that the multiparametric approach has great potential in differentiating between the stages of fibrosis, and thus could play an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of hepatic fibrosis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discriminant analysis; Liver fibrosis; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26945441     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  4 in total

1.  Resolution of Murine Toxic Hepatic Injury Quantified With Ultrasound Entropy Metrics.

Authors:  Jon N Marsh; Kevin M Korenblat; Ta-Chiang Liu; John E McCarthy; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Magnetic resonance elastography in a rabbit model of liver fibrosis: a 3-T longitudinal validation for clinical translation.

Authors:  Liqiu Zou; Jinzhao Jiang; Wenxin Zhong; Chunrong Wang; Wei Xing; Zhuoli Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease using ultrasound with wave-number domain attenuation coefficient.

Authors:  Danqing He; Chaoxue Zhang; Wenqian Qiu; Qinxiu Xie
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Evaluation of Rabbits Liver Fibrosis Using Gd-DTPA-BMA of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Qian Cui; FengTai He; Jiawei Hu; Shuo Li; Dongmei Guo; Xu Bie; Wei Liu; Yiping Zhao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.