Literature DB >> 26944960

Genetic selection to increase bone strength affects prevalence of keel bone damage and egg parameters in commercially housed laying hens.

A Stratmann1, E K F Fröhlich2, S G Gebhardt-Henrich3, A Harlander-Matauschek4, H Würbel5, M J Toscano3.   

Abstract

The prevalence of keel bone damage as well as external egg parameters of 2 pure lines divergently selected for high (H) and low (L) bone strength were investigated in 2 aviary systems under commercial conditions. A standard LSL hybrid was used as a reference group. Birds were kept mixed per genetic line (77 hens of the H and L line and 201 or 206 hens of the LSL line, respectively, per pen) in 8 pens of 2 aviary systems differing in design. Keel bone status and body mass of 20 focal hens per line and pen were assessed at 17, 18, 23, 30, 36, 43, 52, and 63 wk of age. External egg parameters (i.e., egg mass, eggshell breaking strength, thickness, and mass) were measured using 10 eggs per line at both 38 and 57 wk of age. Body parameters (i.e. tarsus and third primary wing feather length to calculate index of wing loading) were recorded at 38 wk of age and mortality per genetic line throughout the laying cycle. Bone mineral density (BMD) of 15 keel bones per genetic line was measured after slaughter to confirm assignment of the experimental lines. We found a greater BMD in the H compared with the L and LSL lines. Fewer keel bone fractures and deviations, a poorer external egg quality, as well as a lower index of wing loading were found in the H compared with the L line. Mortality was lower and production parameters (e.g., laying performance) were higher in the LSL line compared with the 2 experimental lines. Aviary design affected prevalence of keel bone damage, body mass, and mortality. We conclude that selection of specific bone traits associated with bone strength as well as the related differences in body morphology (i.e., lower index of wing loading) have potential to reduce keel bone damage in commercial settings. Also, the housing environment (i.e., aviary design) may have additive effects.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aviary system; bone strength; egg parameter; keel bone damage; laying hen

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944960     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study for bone strength in laying hens.

Authors:  Biaty Raymond; Anna Maria Johansson; Heather Anne McCormack; Robert Hall Fleming; Matthias Schmutz; Ian Chisholm Dunn; Dirk Jan De Koning
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Wing-feather loss in white-feathered laying hens decreases pectoralis thickness but does not increase risk of keel bone fracture.

Authors:  Renée Garant; Bret W Tobalske; Neila Ben Sassi; Nienke van Staaveren; Tina Widowski; Donald R Powers; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Relationship between Bone Quality, Egg Production and Eggshell Quality in Laying Hens at the End of an Extended Production Cycle (105 Weeks).

Authors:  Clara Alfonso-Carrillo; Cristina Benavides-Reyes; Jon de Los Mozos; Nazaret Dominguez-Gasca; Estefanía Sanchez-Rodríguez; Ana Isabel Garcia-Ruiz; Alejandro B Rodriguez-Navarro
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Skeletal variation in bird domestication: limb proportions and sternum in chicken, with comparisons to mallard ducks and Muscovy ducks.

Authors:  Carlos Manuel Herrera-Castillo; Madeleine Geiger; Daniel Núñez-León; Hiroshi Nagashima; Sabine Gebhardt-Henrich; Michael Toscano; Marcelo R Sanchez-Villagra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 5.  Farm Environmental Enrichments Improve the Welfare of Layer Chicks and Pullets: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Gang Shu; Yanting Liu; Pingwu Qin; Yilei Zheng; Yaofu Tian; Xiaoling Zhao; Xiaohui Du
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens-Its Relation to Bone Mineral Density, Body Growth Rate and Laying Performance.

Authors:  Christin Habig; Martina Henning; Ulrich Baulain; Simon Jansen; Armin Manfred Scholz; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Patterns of musculoskeletal growth and dimensional changes associated with selection and developmental plasticity in domestic and wild strain turkeys.

Authors:  Kristin K Stover; Daniel M Weinreich; Thomas J Roberts; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Modeling collisions in laying hens as a tool to identify causative factors for keel bone fractures and means to reduce their occurrence and severity.

Authors:  Michael Toscano; Francesca Booth; Gemma Richards; Steven Brown; Darrin Karcher; John Tarlton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Role of Egg Production in the Etiology of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Beryl Katharina Eusemann; Antonia Patt; Lars Schrader; Steffen Weigend; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  Domestic egg-laying hens, Gallus gallus domesticus, do not modulate flapping flight performance in response to wing condition.

Authors:  Brianna M León; Bret W Tobalske; Neila Ben Sassi; Renée Garant; Donald R Powers; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.