| Literature DB >> 26944936 |
Cheng-Jun Liu1,2,3, Wei Zhou4, Xue-Shan Feng5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In China, there is a large migrant population. A significant proportion of children of the migrant population in China are not able to attend public schools due to the lack of local household registration (HuKou). They turn to privately-operated migrant schools, which are usually under-funded, have bad environmental facilities and are inadequately staffed compared to public schools. This study aims to describe the dental caries status of students from migrant primary schools in Shanghai Pudong New Area and factors that influence their caries status.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26944936 PMCID: PMC4779240 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-016-0187-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Socio-demographic characteristics of the surveyed children and their parents
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | ||
| 7–8 | 376 | 28.42 |
| 9–10 | 436 | 32.96 |
| 11–12 | 511 | 38.62 |
| Gender | ||
| Boy | 745 | 56.31 |
| Girl | 578 | 43.69 |
| Father’s educational background | ||
| Not educated | 34 | 2.57 |
| Primary | 1066 | 80.57 |
| Junior high | 193 | 14.59 |
| Senior high and above | 30 | 2.27 |
| Mother’s educational background | ||
| Not educated | 86 | 6.50 |
| Primary | 1097 | 82.92 |
| Junior high | 117 | 8.84 |
| Senior high and above | 23 | 1.73 |
| Father’s occupation | ||
| Labour/manual worker | 703 | 53.14 |
| Self-employed | 24 | 1.81 |
| Business service people | 343 | 25.93 |
| Agricultural labour | 60 | 4.54 |
| Others | 193 | 14.59 |
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Labour/manual worker | 598 | 45.20 |
| Self-employed | 9 | 0.68 |
| Business service people | 312 | 23.58 |
| Agricultural labour | 60 | 4.54 |
| Others | 344 | 26.00 |
| Family income (annual income per person, Yuan)a | ||
| Mean (SD) | 14404(16632) | |
| Median | 10000 | |
| Total | 1323 | 100.00 |
aAverage family annual income of migrant population was lower than the annual disposable income which was 40188 Yuan of local urban residents and that of local rural residents which was 17401 Yuan respectively (Data source: Shanghai Statistics Bureau, 2012 Shanghai National Economy and Social Development Statistical Bulletin, www.http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/sjfb/201302/253153.html)
Dental caries prevalence and experience of surveyed children with different ages and genders
| Variable | Group | n | % dmft > 0 | dt | mt | ft | dmft(SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary teeth | |||||||
| Age (years old) | 7–8 | 376 | 81.4* | 4.20 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 4.22 (3.57)** |
| 9–10 | 436 | 81.0* | 3.29 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 3.33 (2.73)** | |
| 11–12 | 511 | 41.1* | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.13 (1.83)** | |
| Gender | Boy | 745 | 67.0 | 2.69 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2.72 (2.92) |
| Girl | 578 | 64.0 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 2.76 (3.14) | |
| Total | 1323 | 65.7 | 2.71 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2.74 (3.02) | |
| Permanent teeth | |||||||
| Age (years old) | 7–8 | 376 | 14.6*** | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 (0.61)**** |
| 9–10 | 436 | 32.1*** | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.48 (0.83)**** | |
| 11–12 | 511 | 33.5*** | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 (0.95)**** | |
| Gender | Boy | 745 | 23.0***** | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 (0.76)****** |
| Girl | 578 | 33.7***** | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.55 (0.91)****** | |
| Total | 1323 | 27.7 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 (0.84) | |
| Primary and permanent teeth | 1323 | 74.7 | 3.15 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 3.17(3.12) |
*Significant difference in the three age groups (P < 0.001)
**Significant difference in the three age groups (P < 0.001)
***Significant difference in the three age groups (1.13 < 3.33 < 4.22, P < 0.001)
****Significant difference in the three age groups (0.22 < 0.48,0.56, P < 0.001)
*****Significant difference between boys and girls (P < 0.001)
******Significant difference between boys and girls (P < 0.001)
Caries experience (dmft) and oral health-related behaviours studied
| Oral health-related behaviours (%, N) | Primary teeth dmft (SD) | Permanent teeth dmft (SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Tooth brushing twice or more daily ( | ||
| Yes (31.2 %, 413) | 2.35 (2.93)* | 0.41 (0.46) |
| No (68.8 %, 910) | 2.91 (3.04)* | 0.51 (0.60) |
| Age of initial brushing ( | ||
| ≤ 3 (18.2 %, 213) | 2.59 (2.90** | 0.41 (0.75) |
| > 3 (81.8 %, 957) | 3.10 (3.19)** | 0.46 (0.87) |
| Sweet snacks before sleep without tooth brushing ( | ||
| Often/Occasionally (46.4 %,614) | 2.96 (3.06)*** | 0.48 (0.86) |
| Never (53.6 %, 709) | 2.54 (2.97)*** | 0.40 (0.81) |
| Daily sweet snacks ( | ||
| Yes (18.8 %, 249) | 2.78 (2.96) | 0.75 (1.04)**** |
| No (81.2 %, 1074) | 2.72 (3.03) | 0.44 (0.77)**** |
*, **, ***Significant difference (P < 0.05)
****Significant difference (P < 0.001)
Caries experience (dmft) and parents’ knowledge/attitudes of the child’s oral health
| Parents’ knowledge/attitude of the child’s oral health(%, N) | Primary teeth | Permanent teeth |
|---|---|---|
| Teeth are born good or bad, no correlation with the protection | ||
| Agree (7.0 %, 92) | 2.13 (2.65) | 0.43 (0.79) |
| Disagree (64.7 %, 856) | 2.67 (3.02) | 0.46 (0.86) |
| Unknown (28.3 %, 375) | 3.01 (3.07) | 0.37 (0.80) |
| Oral health is important to life | ||
| Agree (78.2 %, 1034) | 2.70 (3.00) | 0.47 (0.85) |
| Disagree (2.0 %, 26) | 2.73 (3.42) | 0.23 (0.65) |
| Unknown (19.9 %, 263) | 2.90 (3.06) | 0.33 (0.79) |
| It is important to protect the first permanent teeth of children | ||
| Agree (47.2 %, 625) | 2.69 (3.09) | 0.47 (0.87) |
| Disagree (4.6 %, 61) | 1.93 (2.54) | 0.36 (0.78) |
| Unknown (48.2 %, 637) | 2.85 (2.98) | 0.41 (0.81) |
| No need to treat the bad primary teeth | ||
| Agree (11.0 %, 145) | 2.29 (2.74) | 0.48 (0.86) |
| Disagree (52.5 %, 695) | 2.69 (3.05) | 0.48 (0.88) |
| Unknown (36.5 %, 483) | 2.93 (3.04) | 0.37 (0.75) |
| Pit and fissure sealant can prevent dental caries of children | ||
| Agree (14.6 %, 193) | 2.88 (3.20) | 0.54 (0.97) |
| Disagree (16.6 %, 220) | 2.40 (3.02) | 0.50 (0.90) |
| Unknown (68.8 %, 910) | 2.79 (2.97) | 0.40 (0.78) |
| Tooth brushing twice a day can protect teeth | ||
| Agree (70.4 %, 931) | 2.74 (3.05) | 0.47 (0.86) |
| Disagree (4.5 %, 59) | 2.31 (2.43) | 0.54 (1.01) |
| Unknown (25.2 %, 333) | 2.80 (3.02) | 0.33 (0.73) |
Multiple regression analysis for primary and permanent teeth dmft scores (N =1323)
| Independent variables | Group | Beta | SE | 95 % CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary teeth | |||||
| Brushing twice or more daily | Yes | −0.610 | 0.188 | −0.978–0.241 | <0.05 |
| Noa | |||||
| Sweet snacks before Sleep without tooth brushing | Often⁄Occasionally | 0.407 | 0.178 | 0.056–0.757 | <0.05 |
| Nevera | |||||
| Dental visit within the past 12 months | Yes | 1.042 | 0.214 | 0.622–1.462 | <0.001 |
| Noa | |||||
| Intercept | 2.817 | 0.426 | <0.001 | ||
| Permanent teeth | |||||
| Gender | Boys | −0.182 | 0.049 | −0.287–0.093 | <0.001 |
| Girlsa | |||||
| Daily sweet snacks | Yes | 0.189 | 0.060 | 0.071–0.308 | <0.05 |
| Noa | |||||
| Intercept | 0.518 | 0.125 | <0.001 |
aReference category, Primary teeth Adjusted R2 = 0.227, Permanent teeth Adjusted R2 = 0.069