Literature DB >> 2694388

The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: I. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, discography, and CT-discography.

R P Jackson1, G J Becker, R R Jacobs, P X Montesano, B R Cooper, G E McManus.   

Abstract

The accuracy of five imaging modalities for the diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is compared prospectively in 124 patients, all of whom underwent surgical exploration. All tests were read independently of each other and the level of confidence in each diagnosis was recorded. The results are based on negative (106) as well as positive (125) findings at the 231 disc sites (level and side) explored. Computed tomography-discography (disco-CT) was the most accurate test (87%) compared to 77% for CT-myelography (myelo-CT), 74% for CT, 70% for myelography, 64% for disc injection pain, and 58% for discography. The false positive rate was lower for disco-CT (19%) than for myelo-CT (24%), CT (24%), and myelography (30%). The false negative rate was also lower for disco-CT (8%) than for myelo-CT (22%), CT (29%), and myelography (30%). Disco-CT was the most accurate test (94%) in patients who had prior disc surgery compared with 81% for myelo-CT, 80% for CT, and 74% for myelography. Disco-CT was also the most accurate test for patients with foraminal HNP (91% compared with 71% for CT, 65% for myelo-CT, and 58% for myelography). Disc injection reproduced the patient's clinical pain pattern in only 36% of herniated discs. This test has high specificity (89%), but low sensitivity (43%). The risks from myelography followed by discography within a 72-hour period are similar to those reported for myelography alone. Disco-CT is the most accurate of these tests (P less than 0.05) for the diagnosis of lumbar HNP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2694388     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Diagnostics and therapy of spinal disc herniation].

Authors:  A Zimmer; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion.

Authors:  Samuel P Veres; Peter A Robertson; Neil D Broom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Evaluation of diagnosis techniques used for spinal injury related back pain.

Authors:  Meaghan Janssen; Aliaa Nabih; Walied Moussa; Gregory N Kawchuk; Jason P Carey
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-13

Review 6.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review.

Authors:  Rogier M van Rijn; Merel Wassenaar; Arianne P Verhagen; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Abida Z Ginai; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown; a systematic review.

Authors:  Jung-Ha Kim; Rogier M van Rijn; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Michiel R de Boer; Abida Z Ginai; Raymond W G J Ostelo; Danielle A M W van der Windt; Arianne P Verhagen
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.