Literature DB >> 26943841

The influence of depth of anesthesia on motor evoked potential response during awake craniotomy.

Shunya Ohtaki1, Yukinori Akiyama1, Aya Kanno1, Shouhei Noshiro1, Tomo Hayase2, Michiaki Yamakage2, Nobuhiro Mikuni1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are a critical indicator for monitoring motor function during neurological surgery. In this study, the influence of depth of anesthesia on MEP response was assessed. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with brain tumors who underwent awake craniotomy were included in this study. From a state of deep anesthesia until the awake state, MEP amplitude and latency were measured using 5-train electrical bipolar stimulations on the same site of the precentral gyrus each minute during the surgery. The depth of anesthesia was evaluated using the bispectral index (BIS). BIS levels were classified into 7 stages: < 40, and from 40 to 100 in groups of 10 each. MEP amplitude and latency of each stage were compared. The deviation of the MEP measurements, which was defined as a fluctuation from the average in every BIS stage, was also considered. RESULTS A total of 865 MEP waves in 28 cases were evaluated in this study. MEP amplitude was increased and latency was decreased in accordance with the increases in BIS level. The average MEP amplitudes in the > 90 BIS level was approximately 10 times higher than those in the < 40 BIS level. Furthermore, the average MEP latencies in the > 90 BIS level were 1.5-3.1 msec shorter than those in the < 60 BIS level. The deviation of measured MEP amplitudes in the > 90 BIS level was significantly stabilized in comparison with that in the < 60 BIS level. CONCLUSIONS MEP amplitude and latency were closely correlated with depth of anesthesia. In addition, the deviation in MEP amplitude was also correlated with depth of anesthesia, which was smaller during awake surgery (high BIS level) than during deep anesthesia. Therefore, MEP measurement would be more reliable in the awake state than under deep anesthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIS = bispectral index; EEG = electroencephalography; EMG = electromyography; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; MEP = motor evoked potential; anesthesia depth; bispectral index; diagnostic and operative techniques; motor evoked potential

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943841     DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.JNS151291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  10 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hiroki Iida; Satoshi Tanaka; Naokazu Fukuoka; Hironobu Hayashi; Shunsuke Izumi; Kenji Yoshitani; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Motor Mapping of the Brain: Taniguchi Versus Penfield Method.

Authors:  Faisal R Jahangiri; Marie Liang; Shabab S Kabir; Oly Khowash
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Comparison of false-negative/positive results of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring between no and partial neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving propofol/remifentanil-based anesthesia during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery: A retrospective analysis of 685 patients.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Kim; Seok-Joon Jin; Myong-Hwan Karm; Young-Jin Moon; Hye-Won Jeong; Jae-Won Kim; Seung-Il Ha; Joung-Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Predictors of stimulation-induced seizures during perirolandic glioma resection using intraoperative mapping techniques.

Authors:  Ahmed A Morsy; Ayman M Ismail; Yasser M Nasr; Salwa H Waly; Esam A Abdelhameed
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-03-24

5.  Intraoperative hand strength as an indicator of consciousness during awake craniotomy: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Chinatsu Umaba; Yohei Mineharu; Nan Liang; Toshiyuki Mizota; Rie Yamawaki; Masaya Ueda; Yukihiro Yamao; Manabu Nankaku; Susumu Miyamoto; Shuichi Matsuda; Hiroyuki Inadomi; Yoshiki Arakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on somatosensory-evoked and motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bingbing Xiang; Shulan Jiao; Yulong Zhang; Lu Wang; Yuting Yao; Feng Yuan; Rui Chen; Qijun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Anesthesia inhibited corticospinal excitability and attenuated the modulation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Tengfei Wang; Jingna Jin; He Wang; Ying Li; Zhipeng Liu; Tao Yin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.376

8.  Preoperative nTMS and Intraoperative Neurophysiology - A Comparative Analysis in Patients With Motor-Eloquent Glioma.

Authors:  Tizian Rosenstock; Mehmet Salih Tuncer; Max Richard Münch; Peter Vajkoczy; Thomas Picht; Katharina Faust
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Threshold variation of transcranial motor evoked potential with threshold criterion in frontotemporal craniotomy.

Authors:  Kohei Kanaya; Tetsuya Goto; Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-09-04

10.  Preoperative Prediction of Communication Difficulties during Awake Craniotomy in Glioma Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation of 136 Cases at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Kuribara; Yukinori Akiyama; Takeshi Mikami; Yusuke Kimura; Katsuya Komatsu; Rei Enatsu; Yasuyuki Tokinaga; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.