Literature DB >> 26943257

Rate of perioperative neurological complications after surgery for cervical spinal cord stimulation.

Andrew K Chan1, Ethan A Winkler1, Line Jacques1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) is used to treat pain of the cervical region and upper extremities. Case reports and small series have shown a relatively low risk of complication after cSCS, with only a single reported case of perioperative spinal cord injury in the literature. Catastrophic cSCS-associated spinal cord injury remains a concern as a result of underreporting. To aid in preoperative counseling, it is necessary to establish a minimum rate of spinal cord injury and surgical complication following cSCS. METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is a stratified sample of 20% of all patient discharges from nonfederal hospitals in the United States. The authors identified discharges with a primary procedure code for spinal cord stimulation (ICD-9 03.93) associated with a primary diagnosis of cervical pathology from 2002 to 2011. They then analyzed short-term safety outcomes including the presence of spinal cord injury and neurological, medical, and general perioperative complications and compared outcomes using univariate analysis. RESULTS Between 2002 and 2011, there were 2053 discharges for cSCS. The spinal cord injury rate was 0.5%. The rates of any neurological, medical, and general perioperative complications were 1.1%, 1.4%, and 11.7%, respectively. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS In the largest series of cSCS, the risk of spinal cord injury was higher than previously reported (0.5%). Nonetheless, this procedure remains relatively safe, and physicians may use these data to corroborate the safety of cSCS in an appropriately selected patient population. This may become a key treatment option in an increasingly opioid-dependent, aging population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DVT = deep venous thrombosis; HCUP = Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases; LOS = length of stay; NIS = Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Ninth Revision; PE = pulmonary embolism; SCS; cSCS = cervical spinal cord stimulation; cervical spinal cord stimulation; neuromodulation; neurostimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943257     DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  4 in total

1.  Ten kilohertz SCS for Treatment of Chronic Upper Extremity Pain (UEP): Results from Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Abram Burgher; Peter Kosek; Steven Surrett; Steven M Rosen; Todd Bromberg; Ashish Gulve; Anu Kansal; Paul Wu; W Porter McRoberts; Ashish Udeshi; Michael Esposito; Bradford E Gliner; Mona Maneshi; Anand Rotte; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Outcomes of 10 kHz SCS in Patients with Upper Limb and Neck Pain.

Authors:  Dawood Sayed; John Salmon; Talal W Khan; Andrew M Sack; Ted Braun; Adele Barnard; Anand Rotte
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Combined Neck and Arm Pain: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kasra Amirdelfan; Ricardo Vallejo; Ramsin Benyamin; Cong Yu; Thomas Yang; Richard Bundschu; Thomas L Yearwood; B Todd Sitzman; Bradford Gliner; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan; Anand Rotte; David Caraway
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ganesan Baranidharan; Beatrice Bretherton; Craig Montgomery; John Titterington; Tracey Crowther; Christopher Vannabouathong; Jason A Inzana; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-05-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.