Literature DB >> 26943164

Leaf color is fine-tuned on the solar spectra to avoid strand direct solar radiation.

Atsushi Kume1, Tomoko Akitsu2, Kenlo Nishida Nasahara2.   

Abstract

The spectral distributions of light absorption rates by intact leaves are notably different from the incident solar radiation spectra, for reasons that remain elusive. Incident global radiation comprises two main components; direct radiation from the direction of the sun, and diffuse radiation, which is sunlight scattered by molecules, aerosols and clouds. Both irradiance and photon flux density spectra differ between direct and diffuse radiation in their magnitude and profile. However, most research has assumed that the spectra of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) can be averaged, without considering the radiation classes. We used paired spectroradiometers to sample direct and diffuse solar radiation, and obtained relationships between the PAR spectra and the absorption spectra of photosynthetic pigments and organs. As monomers in solvent, the spectral absorbance of Chl a decreased with the increased spectral irradiance (W m(-2) nm(-1)) of global PAR at noon (R(2) = 0.76), and was suitable to avoid strong spectral irradiance (λmax = 480 nm) rather than absorb photon flux density (μmol m(-2) s(-1) nm(-1)) efficiently. The spectral absorption of photosystems and the intact thallus and leaves decreased linearly with the increased spectral irradiance of direct PAR at noon (I dir-max), where the wavelength was within the 450-650 nm range (R(2) = 0.81). The higher-order structure of photosystems systematically avoided the strong spectral irradiance of I dir-max. However, when whole leaves were considered, leaf anatomical structure and light scattering in leaf tissues made the leaves grey bodies for PAR and enabled high PAR use efficiency. Terrestrial green plants are fine-tuned to spectral dynamics of incident solar radiation and PAR absorption is increased in various structural hierarchies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absorption spectra; Chlorophyll; Photosystem; Solar radiation spectra; Spectral matching; Terrestrial environment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943164     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-016-0809-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  14 in total

1.  Evidence for the role of the oxygen-evolving manganese complex in photoinhibition of Photosystem II.

Authors:  Marja Hakala; Ilona Tuominen; Mika Keränen; Taina Tyystjärvi; Esa Tyystjärvi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2005-01-07

2.  Absorption spectra of chlorophyll a and b in Lhcb protein environment.

Authors:  G Cinque; R Croce; R Bassi
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Absorption Spectra of Leaves. I. The Visible Spectrum.

Authors:  R A Moss; W E Loomis
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  A new paradigm in leaf-level photosynthesis: direct and diffuse lights are not equal.

Authors:  Craig R Brodersen; Thomas C Vogelmann; William E Williams; Holly L Gorton
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 5.  Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green.

Authors:  Ichiro Terashima; Takashi Fujita; Takeshi Inoue; Wah Soon Chow; Riichi Oguchi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  A dual strategy to cope with high light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Guillaume Allorent; Ryutaro Tokutsu; Thomas Roach; Graham Peers; Pierre Cardol; Jacqueline Girard-Bascou; Daphné Seigneurin-Berny; Dimitris Petroutsos; Marcel Kuntz; Cécile Breyton; Fabrice Franck; Francis-André Wollman; Krishna K Niyogi; Anja Krieger-Liszkay; Jun Minagawa; Giovanni Finazzi
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Photosynthetic quantum yield dynamics: from photosystems to leaves.

Authors:  Sander W Hogewoning; Emilie Wientjes; Peter Douwstra; Govert Trouwborst; Wim van Ieperen; Roberta Croce; Jeremy Harbinson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 8.  The distribution and action in photosynthesis of several forms of chlorophyll.

Authors:  C S French
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The major antenna complex of photosystem II has a xanthophyll binding site not involved in light harvesting.

Authors:  S Caffarri; R Croce; J Breton; R Bassi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  A viewpoint: why chlorophyll a?

Authors:  Lars Olof Björn; George C Papageorgiou; Robert E Blankenship
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  3 in total

1.  2019 Awards in the Journal of Plant Research.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Importance of the green color, absorption gradient, and spectral absorption of chloroplasts for the radiative energy balance of leaves.

Authors:  Atsushi Kume
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Why is chlorophyll b only used in light-harvesting systems?

Authors:  Atsushi Kume; Tomoko Akitsu; Kenlo Nishida Nasahara
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.629

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.