Literature DB >> 26943162

An optimised protocol to isolate high-quality genomic DNA from seed tissues streamlines the workflow to obtain direct estimates of seed dispersal distances in gymnosperms.

C García1, G Escribano-Ávila2.   

Abstract

Genotyping of maternally derived seed tissues from georefered seeds that moved away from their source tree yield direct estimates of seed dispersal distances when the location and the genotype of the fruiting tree are available. These estimates are instrumental in forecasting the response of plant communities to drivers of global change, such as fragmentation or the expansion of invasive species. Obtaining robust assessments of seed dispersal distances requires comparing reliable multilocus genotypes of maternally derived seed tissues and fruiting trees, as previously shown for angiosperm species. However, robust estimates of seed dispersal distances based on direct methods are rare in non-model gymnosperms due to the difficulty in isolating high quality DNA from inconspicuous maternally derived seed tissues. These tissues tend to yield low DNA quantities that increase the frequency of genotyping errors. Here, we deliver a step-by-step visual protocol used to identify and isolate different seed tissues of interest for dispersal studies: embryos (2n, bi-parentally derived), seed coats (2n, maternally derived), and megagametophytes (n, maternally derived). We also provide an optimised lab protocol used to obtain multilocus genotypes from the target seed tissue. These broadly applicable protocols proved successful both in avoiding contamination among different seed tissues and providing reliable multilocus genotypes.

Keywords:  Allele matching; Embryo; Endocarp; Maternal tree; Maternity analyses; Megagametophyte; SSRs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943162     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-016-0806-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  10 in total

1.  An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments.

Authors:  M Schuelke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites.

Authors:  J A Godoy; P Jordano
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis.

Authors:  J J Robledo-Arnuncio; L Gil
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  A novel approach to an old problem: tracking dispersed seeds.

Authors:  Delphine Grivet; Peter E Smouse; Victoria L Sork
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Long-distance dispersal of plants.

Authors:  Ran Nathan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands.

Authors:  J C Biesmeijer; S P M Roberts; M Reemer; R Ohlemüller; M Edwards; T Peeters; A P Schaffers; S G Potts; R Kleukers; C D Thomas; J Settele; W E Kunin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Contemporary pollen and seed dispersal in a Prunus mahaleb population: patterns in distance and direction.

Authors:  C García; P Jordano; J A Godoy
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Permanent genetic resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 February 2013-31 March 2013.

Authors:  M C Arias; Christiane Atteke; S C Augusto; J Bailey; Pilar Bazaga; Luciano B Beheregaray; Laure Benoit; Rumsaïs Blatrix; Céline Born; R M Brito; Hai-kui Chen; Sara Covarrubias; Clara de Vega; Champlain Djiéto-Lordon; Marie-Pierre Dubois; F O Francisco; Cristina García; P H P Gonçalves; Clementina González; Carla Gutiérrez-Rodríguez; Michael P Hammer; Carlos M Herrera; H Itoh; S Kamimura; H Karaoglu; S Kojima; Shou-Li Li; Hannah J Ling; Pável F Matos-Maraví; Doyle McKey; Judicaël Mezui-M'Eko; Juan Francisco Ornelas; R F Park; María I Pozo; Satu Ramula; Cristina Rigueiro; Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo; L R Santiago; Miyuki M Seino; Chang-Bing Song; H Takeshima; Anti Vasemägi; C R Wellings; Ji Yan; Du Yu-Zhou; Chang-Rong Zhang; Tian-Yun Zhang
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 9.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Rodolfo Dirzo; Hillary S Young; Mauro Galetti; Gerardo Ceballos; Nick J B Isaac; Ben Collen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite analysis of Abies sachalinensis regeneration on fallen logs in a subboreal forest in Hokkaido, Japan.

Authors:  Chunlan Lian; Susumu Goto; Takuya Kubo; Yasuo Takahashi; Masahiko Nakagawa; Taizo Hogetsu
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 6.185

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the accuracy of variant calling methods using the frequency of parent-offspring genotype mismatch.

Authors:  Russ J Jasper; Tegan Krista McDonald; Pooja Singh; Mengmeng Lu; Clément Rougeux; Brandon M Lind; Sam Yeaman
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 8.678

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.