Literature DB >> 26943151

Association Between Photoreceptor Regeneration and Visual Acuity Following Surgery for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Misato Kobayashi1, Takeshi Iwase1, Kentaro Yamamoto1, Eimei Ra1, Kenta Murotani2, Shigeyuki Matsui3, Hiroko Terasaki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate foveal regeneration and the association between retinal restoration and visual acuity following reattachment surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with successfully reattached macula-off RRD were retrospectively analyzed. We used spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to image macular regions and measure retinal thickness and Snellen chart visual acuity (VA) to evaluate best-corrected VA (BCVA) at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity data were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution scale. Opposite eyes were used as controls.
RESULTS: The thicknesses of the external limiting membrane (ELM)-ellipsoid zone (EZ) and EZ-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were significantly thinner in involved eyes than in corresponding unaffected eyes at 1 month after surgery (P < 0.001 for both), and the thickness increased over time (P < 0.001 for both). Best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved over time (P < 0.001), and the improvement correlated with EZ-RPE thickness (r = -0.45, P = 0.021). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated the presence of a foveal bulge as the independent predictor of final BCVA (P < 0.001). Eyes with a foveal bulge had significantly better BCVA and greater EZ-RPE thickness than those without throughout the follow-up period. Significant restoration of the integrity of EZ and cone interdigitation zone (CIZ) was observed over time (P < 0.001 for both) in eyes with a foveal bulge.
CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of EZ-RPE and cone density increased during foveal regeneration, as demonstrated by the continuous improvements in CIZ integrity over time, leading to the formation of foveal bulge and good vision following successful reattachment of macula-off RRD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943151     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  18 in total

Review 1.  The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Josep Callizo; Lars-Olof Hattenbach; Hans Hoerauf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Retinal thickness in parafoveal subfields and visual acuity after vitrectomy for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Sato; Taku Wakabayashi; Nobuhiko Shiraki; Hirokazu Sakaguchi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  [The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment].

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Josep Callizo; Lars-Olof Hattenbach; Hans Hoerauf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Mechanisms of vision loss in eyes with macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Iijima
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Scleral Buckling: A Look at the Past, Present and Future in View of Recent Findings on the Importance of Photoreceptor Re-Alignment Following Retinal Re-Attachment.

Authors:  Miguel Cruz-Pimentel; Chyong Yng Huang; Lihteh Wu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Evaluation of macular vessel density changes after vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Jian Jiang; Song Chen; Ya-Ding Jia; Rui Li; Jin-Xiu Zhou; Rui-Mei Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  New optical coherence tomography grading system for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: how off is off?

Authors:  Karl Thomas Boden; Kai Januschowski; Peter Szurman; Anna-Maria Seuthe; Annekatrin Rickmann; Berthold Seitz; Mohammad Alsharairi; Stephan Leers; Philip Wakili
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Visual deterioration in patients with photoreceptor loss after retinal reattachment surgery.

Authors:  Sana Rasool; Megha Kaushik; Rishika Chaudhary; Karen Blachford; Martin Berry; Robert A H Scott; Ann Logan; Richard J Blanch
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Ten years follow-up after surgery for a foveal detachment due to optic disc pit: a case report of outer retinal layer healing.

Authors:  Audrey Giocanti-Aurégan; Elige A Chbat; Christophe G H Morel; Bruno R Morin; John G Conrath; François C Devin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Perioperative factors that are significantly correlated with final visual acuity in eyes after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  Misato Kobayashi; Takeshi Iwase; Kentaro Yamamoto; Eimei Ra; Kenta Murotani; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.