Literature DB >> 26942368

Industry Payments to Obstetrician-Gynecologists: An Analysis of 2014 Open Payments Data.

Nicole M Tierney1, Cheryl Saenz, Michael McHale, Kristy Ward, Steven Plaxe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate publically available, individually identified data regarding industry payments made to obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) during 2014 posted on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Open Payments website for the purposes of encouraging ob-gyns to partake in disclosure of their fiscal relationships to patients and to take an active role in maintaining accuracy of their payment data.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Open Payments website for all 2014 nonresearch payments to ob-gyns. We compared payments to ob-gyns with payments to those in other specialties as well as subspecialties within the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Univariate statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Payments to ob-gyns totaled $60,004,472 (3.3% of the total value transferred in 2014) and went to 29,783 physician recipients. Fifty percent of these payments were for royalties and licensing. Obstetrics and gynecology ranked seventh in total number of payments made to a single specialty (n=311,485), and 20th of 35 specialties for highest median payment ($140, interquartile range $50-347). Medtronic USA, Inc. was the leading payer to ob-gyns.
CONCLUSION: Ob-gyns are listed as having received substantial payments from industry in 2014. Because this information is publically available, we suggest physicians become familiar with payment data and the correction process, keep independent records, and register for updates to most effectively manage perceived, or real, conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942368     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Characteristics of Industry Payments to Ophthalmologists in the Open Payments Database.

Authors:  Dane H Slentz; Christine C Nelson; Paul R Lichter
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Susan F Wood; Joanna Podrasky; Meghan A McMonagle; Janani Raveendran; Tyler Bysshe; Alycia Hogenmiller; Adriane Fugh-Berman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mining Open Payments Data: Analysis of Industry Payments to Thoracic Surgeons From 2014-2016.

Authors:  Xu Na; Haihong Guo; Yu Zhang; Liu Shen; Sizhu Wu; Jiao Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Impact of US industry payment disclosure laws on payments to surgeons: a natural experiment.

Authors:  Taeho Greg Rhee; Tijana Stanic; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2020-01-03

Review 5.  Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors.

Authors:  Jorge Roman; David J Elpern; John G Zampella
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.