Literature DB >> 26942363

Anatomical Cystocele Recurrence: Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model.

Tineke F M Vergeldt1, Sander M J van Kuijk, Kim J B Notten, Kirsten B Kluivers, Mirjam Weemhoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model that estimates the risk of anatomical cystocele recurrence after surgery.
METHODS: The databases of two multicenter prospective cohort studies were combined, and we performed a retrospective secondary analysis of these data. Women undergoing an anterior colporrhaphy without mesh materials and without previous pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery filled in a questionnaire, underwent translabial three-dimensional ultrasonography, and underwent staging of POP preoperatively and postoperatively. We developed a prediction model using multivariable logistic regression and internally validated it using standard bootstrapping techniques. The performance of the prediction model was assessed by computing indices of overall performance, discriminative ability, calibration, and its clinical utility by computing test characteristics.
RESULTS: Of 287 included women, 149 (51.9%) had anatomical cystocele recurrence. Factors included in the prediction model were assisted delivery, preoperative cystocele stage, number of compartments involved, major levator ani muscle defects, and levator hiatal area during Valsalva. Potential predictors that were excluded after backward elimination because of high P values were age, body mass index, number of vaginal deliveries, and family history of POP. The shrinkage factor resulting from the bootstrap procedure was 0.91. After correction for optimism, Nagelkerke's R and the Brier score were 0.15 and 0.22, respectively. This indicates satisfactory model fit. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 71.6% (95% confidence interval 65.7-77.5). After correction for optimism, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 69.7%.
CONCLUSION: This prediction model, including history of assisted delivery, preoperative stage, number of compartments, levator defects, and levator hiatus, estimates the risk of anatomical cystocele recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942363     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Friedman; Guy D Eslick; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  A risk assessment model for chronic ankle instability: indications for early surgical treatment? An observational prospective cohort - study protocol.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Vuurberg; Lauren M Wink; Leendert Blankevoort; Daniel Haverkamp; Robert Hemke; Sjoerd Jens; Inger N Sierevelt; Mario Maas; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Yeung; Eva Malacova; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Risk of major postoperative complications in breast reconstructive surgery with and without an acellular dermal matrix: A development of a prognostic prediction model.

Authors:  N S Hillberg; J Hogenboom; J Hommes; S M J Van Kuijk; X H A Keuter; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Recurrence risk is associated with preoperatively advanced prolapse stage: Is there a difference between women with stage 2 and those with stage 3 or 4 cystocele?

Authors:  Tineke F M Vergeldt; Kim J B Notten; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mirjam Weemhoff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alfredo L Milani; Anne Damoiseaux; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mariella I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pieternel Steures; Alfredo L Milani; Deliana A van Rumpt-van de Geest; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Who Underwent Transvaginal Mesh Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Lin; Fung-Chao Tu; Ho-Hsiung Lin; Sheng-Mou Hsiao
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Preoperative level II/III MRI measures predicting long-term prolapse recurrence after native tissue repair.

Authors:  Payton Schmidt; Luyun Chen; John O DeLancey; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.