Literature DB >> 26942294

Accurate quantitative assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis using pixel-by-pixel, time-intensity curve shape analysis.

Taro Sakashita1, Tamotsu Kamishima2, Yuto Kobayashi3, Hiroyuki Sugimori4,5, Minghui Tang1, Kenneth Sutherland6, Atsushi Noguchi7,8, Michihito Kono7,8, Tatsuya Atsumi7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve on the reproducibility and sensitivity of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), two semi-automated measurement methods of the area of enhancing pannus (AEP), based on thresholding (AEP_THRES) and pixel-by-pixel time-intensity curve analysis (AEP_TIC), were evaluated as an alternative for the gold-standard manual contouring method (AEP_MANUAL).
METHODS: 8 patients (7 females and 1 male) with RA of the wrist or finger joints participated in the study. A three-dimensional contrast-enhanced dynamic sequence was used at 3 T. After identifying the most relevant time-intensity curve (TIC) shape in terms of synovitis by comparing with the synovitis score using the RA-MRI scoring system, three different approaches for measuring the AEP were performed. Spearman's test of rank correlation was used to compare AEPs via two semi-automated methods (AEP_THRES and AEP_TIC) against manual segmentation (AEP_MANUAL) in the entire hand region as well as the wrist and the finger regions.
RESULTS: The TIC shape of "washout after fast initial enhancement" had excellent correlation with synovitis score (r = 0.809). The correlation coefficient between AEP_TIC and AEP_MANUAL was evaluated to be better than that of AEP_THRES and AEP_MANUAL in the wrist region (AEP_THRES: r = 0.716, AEP_TIC: r = 0.815), whereas these were of comparable accuracy for the entire hand and the finger regions.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that TIC analysis may be an alternative to manual contouring for pannus quantification and provides important clinical information of the extent of the disease in patients with RA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: TIC shape analysis can be applied for new quantitative assessment for RA synovitis in the wrist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942294      PMCID: PMC4985481          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20151000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis: the evolution of clinical applications through clinical trials.

Authors:  C G Peterfy
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures.

Authors:  Paul Bird; Marissa Lassere; Ron Shnier; John Edmonds
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-03

3.  Simplified approach to MR image quantification of the rheumatoid wrist: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kamishima; Kazuhide Tanimura; Yuko Aoki; Naoki Kosaka; Masato Shimizu; Megumi Matsuhashi; Jun Fukae; Yujiro Kon; Satoshi Terae; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  An introduction to the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas.

Authors:  M Østergaard; J Edmonds; F McQueen; C Peterfy; M Lassere; B Ejbjerg; P Bird; P Emery; H Genant; P Conaghan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Quantitative assessment of the synovial membrane in the rheumatoid wrist: an easily obtained MRI score reflects the synovial volume.

Authors:  M Ostergaard; M Hansen; M Stoltenberg; I Lorenzen
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-10

6.  Different approaches to synovial membrane volume determination by magnetic resonance imaging: manual versus automated segmentation.

Authors:  M Ostergaard
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-11

7.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score.

Authors:  Marissa Lassere; Fiona McQueen; Mikkel Østergaard; Philip Conaghan; Ron Shnier; Charles Peterfy; Mette Klarlund; Paul Bird; Philip O'Connor; Neal Stewart; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 4: an international multicenter longitudinal study using the RA-MRI Score.

Authors:  Philip Conaghan; Marissa Lassere; Mikkel Østergaard; Charles Peterfy; Fiona McQueen; Philip O'Connor; Paul Bird; Bo Ejbjerg; Mette Klarlund; Ron Shnier; Harry Genant; Paul Emery; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can discriminate active from inactive disease.

Authors:  Marco A Cimmino; Stefania Innocenti; Fabrizio Livrone; Francesca Magnaguagno; Enzo Silvestri; Giacomo Garlaschi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-05

Review 10.  MRI quantification of rheumatoid arthritis: current knowledge and future perspectives.

Authors:  Mikael Boesen; Mikkel Østergaard; Marco A Cimmino; Olga Kubassova; Karl Erik Jensen; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cartilage quantification using contrast-enhanced MRI in the wrist of rheumatoid arthritis: cartilage loss is associated with bone marrow edema.

Authors:  Motoshi Fujimori; Satoko Nakamura; Kiminori Hasegawa; Kunihiro Ikeno; Shota Ichikawa; Kenneth Sutherland; Tamotsu Kamishima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Composite assessment of power Doppler ultrasonography and MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study of predictive value in radiographic progression after one year.

Authors:  Motoshi Fujimori; Tamotsu Kamishima; Masaru Kato; Yumika Seno; Kenneth Sutherland; Hiroyuki Sugimori; Mutsumi Nishida; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.