| Literature DB >> 26942077 |
Kirsten D Mertz1, Lukas F Mager2, Marie-Hélène Wasmer3, Thore Thiesler4, Viktor H Koelzer3, Giulia Ruzzante5, Stefanie Joller5, Jenna R Murdoch5, Thomas Brümmendorf5, Vera Genitsch3, Alessandro Lugli3, Gieri Cathomas1, Holger Moch6, Achim Weber6, Inti Zlobec3, Tobias Junt5, Philippe Krebs3.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops through a multistep process and is modulated by inflammation. However, the inflammatory pathways that support intestinal tumors at different stages remain incompletely understood. Interleukin (IL)-33 signaling plays a role in intestinal inflammation, yet its contribution to the pathogenesis of CRC is unknown. Using immunohistochemistry on 713 resected human CRC specimens, we show here that IL-33 and its receptor ST2 are expressed in low-grade and early-stage human CRCs, and to a lesser extent in higher-grade and more advanced-stage tumors. In a mouse model of CRC, ST2-deficiency protects from tumor development. Moreover, bone marrow (BM) chimera studies indicate that engagement of the IL-33/ST2 pathway on both the radio-resistant and radio-sensitive compartment is essential for CRC development. Mechanistically, activation of IL-33/ST2 signaling compromises the integrity of the intestinal barrier and triggers the production of pro-tumorigenic IL-6 by immune cells. Together, this data reveals a tumor-promoting role of IL-33/ST2 signaling in CRC.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; IL-33; ST2; inflammation; mouse model; tissue microarray; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2015 PMID: 26942077 PMCID: PMC4760343 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1062966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 8.110
Figure 1.Representative picture of TMA cores showing healthy mucosa, low-grade and high-grade adenocarcinomas, respectively. Sections were stained for (A) IL-33 or (B) ST2. Scale bars: overview: 100 µm; inlay 25 µm.
Association of clinicopathological features and IL-33
| IL-33 Freq. (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (≤5%) | High (>5%) | |||
| Feature | | |||
| Patient age ( | Median (range) | 75 (15–100) | 73 (32–95) | 0.2189 |
| Gender ( | ||||
| Male | 323 (56.1) | 62 (45.3) | 0.0224 | |
| Female | 253 (43.9) | 75 (54.7) | ||
| Tumor location ( | ||||
| Left | 225 (39.6) | 50 (37.0) | 0.7668 | |
| Rectum | 47 (8.3) | 10 (7.4) | ||
| Right | 296 (52.1) | 75 (55.6) | ||
| pT ( | ||||
| pT1–2 | 87 (15.1) | 32 (23.4) | 0.0199 | |
| pT3–4 | 489 (84.9) | 105 (76.6) | ||
| pN ( | ||||
| pN0 | 304 (53.2) | 79 (59.0) | 0.2484 | |
| pN1–2 | 267 (46.8) | 55 (41.0) | ||
| pM ( | ||||
| pM0 | 347 (79.2) | 49 (73.1) | 0.2592 | |
| pM1 | 91 (20.8) | 18 (26.9) | ||
| UICC Stage ( | ||||
| I | 61 (10.7) | 25 (18.7) | 0.0723 | |
| II | 223 (39.1) | 52 (38.8) | ||
| III | 196 (34.3) | 39 (29.1) | ||
| IV | 91 (15.9) | 18 (13.4) | ||
| Tumor grade ( | ||||
| G1–2 | 414 (72.6) | 120 (87.6) | 0.0003 | |
| G3 | 156 (27.4) | 17 (12.4) | ||
| Lymphatic invasion ( | ||||
| L0 | 302 (86.8) | 53 (91.4) | 0.328 | |
| L1 | 46 (13.2) | 5 (8.6) | ||
| Venous invasion ( | ||||
| V0 | 294 (75.0) | 59 (79.7) | 0.3839 | |
| V1–2 | 98 (25.0) | 15 (20.3) | ||
| Adjuvant therapy ( | ||||
| None | 173 (70.0) | 31 (70.5) | 0.9559 | |
| Treated | 74 (30.0) | 13 (29.6) | ||
| OS ( | ||||
| Median (95%CI) | 66 (39–120) | 61 (34–n.e.) | 0.6868 | |
OS, overall survival; n.e., not evaluable.
Association of clinicopathological features and ST2
| ST2 Freq. (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (≤30%) | High (>30%) | |||
| Feature | | P-value | ||
| Patient age ( | Median (range) | 75 (29–100) | 76 (15–98) | 0.4422 |
| Gender ( | ||||
| Male | 146 (57.7) | 113 (55.4) | 0.6195 | |
| Female | 107 (42.3) | 91 (44.6) | ||
| Tumor location ( | ||||
| Left | 95 (38.2) | 100 (50.5) | 0.0102 | |
| Rectum | 15 (6.0) | 16 (8.1) | ||
| Right | 139 (55.8) | 82 (41.4) | ||
| pT ( | ||||
| pT1–2 | 35 (13.8) | 32 (15.7) | 0.5967 | |
| pT3–4 | 218 (86.2) | 172 (84.3) | ||
| pN ( | ||||
| pN0 | 128 (50.8) | 129 (63.9) | 0.0052 | |
| pN1–2 | 124 (49.2) | 73 (36.1) | ||
| pM ( | ||||
| pM0 | 217 (85.8) | 173 (85.2) | 0.8685 | |
| pM1 | 36 (14.2) | 30 (14.8) | ||
| UICC Stage ( | ||||
| I | 23 (9.1) | 29 (14.4) | 0.0074 | |
| II | 94 (37.3) | 93 (46.0) | ||
| III | 99 (39.3) | 50 (24.8) | ||
| IV | 36 (14.3) | 30 (14.9) | ||
| Tumor grade ( | ||||
| G1–2 | 175 (70.0) | 166 (82.2) | 0.0028 | |
| G3 | 75 (30.0) | 36 (17.8) | ||
| Lymphatic invasion ( | ||||
| L0 | 181 (85.4) | 174 (89.7) | 0.1902 | |
| L1 | 31 (14.6) | 20 (10.3) | ||
| Venous invasion ( | ||||
| V0 | 169 (77.2) | 168 (84.9) | 0.0467 | |
| V1–2 | 50 (22.8) | 30 (15.1) | ||
| Adjuvant therapy ( | ||||
| None | 99 (67.4) | 105 (72.9) | 0.2994 | |
| Treated | 48 (32.7) | 39 (27.1) | ||
| Overall survival (%) ( | ||||
| Median (95%CI) | 66 (34–n.e.) | 53 (42–120) | 0.5802 | |
n.e., not evaluable.
Figure 2.Genetic disruption of the IL-33/ST2 axis protects mice from AOM/DSS-induced CRC. (A) Macroscopic pictures of colonic tumors in representative WT and St2 mice. Black arrowheads indicate single tumors. (B) Reduction in number of tumors, tumor load and tumor grade in St2 compared with WT mice. (C) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections displaying the most advanced tumor grades in WT and St2 groups. Scale bars: overview: 200 µm; inlay 50 µm. Data represent means ± SEM; n = 9 samples per group. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t test (tumor number and severity) or Mann–Whitney test (tumor load).
Figure 3.IL-33 and St2 expression are induced in CRC in mice. (A) IHC for IL-33 of healthy and tumor WT intestinal tissue. Scale bars: overview: 200 µm; inlay 25 µm. (B) Increased St2 transcript levels in WT tumor vs. adjacent tumor-free tissue. Data represent means ± SEM; n = 9 samples per group; n.d., non-detected. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test.
Figure 4.IL-33/ST2 signaling on both the radio-resistant and radio-sensitive compartment supports CRC development. (A) Number of tumors and (B) tumor load was analyzed in the indicated sets of chimeric mice. Data are means ± SEM and representative of one experiment; n = 7–10 samples per group. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test.
Figure 5.Engagement of the IL-33/ST2 signaling compromises the integrity of the intestinal barrier and stimulates the production of pro-tumorigenic IL-6. Indicated groups of BM chimeric mice were challenged with DSS and (A) LPS and (B) IL-6 were measured in the serum; n = 5–9 samples. (C) IL-33 stimulated Il6 expression in lamina propria (LP) and caudal lymph node (CLN) immune cells from DSS-treated WT mice. For LP, cells were pooled from 5 donors and analyzed. Three independent experiments were performed, each represented by a dot. For CLN, cells from four individual mice were analyzed. (D) Serial sections of low-grade human colonic adenocarcinomas were stained for IL-6 or CD11c. Scale bars: representative overview: 100 µm; inlay 25 µm. Data are means ± SEM and show one representative from two independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t test (A, B) and paired Student t test (C).
Figure 6.Model for the role of the IL-33/ST2 pathway in CRC. (A) Stress/damage drives the production and release of IL-33 which binds to its receptor ST2 on immune effector cells and (B) drives the production of pro-tumorigenic factors, including IL-6. (1) IL-33 also binds to ST2 on IECs, (2) which decreases the tightness of the intestinal barrier and (3) promotes the translocation of intestinal bacteria or bacterial products via the blood stream. Bacteria-derived molecules such as LPS enter otherwise sterile compartments and engage innate immune receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (4) to trigger the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6. It is not clear whether ST2+ immune cells also express TLRs. (5/C) IL-6 acts on IECs to promote tumor development via the phosphorylation of the oncogenic transcription factor STAT3.