Xin Li1, Bin Hu1, Jinbai Miao1, Hui Li1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a modified silicone fluted drain tube after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection. METHODS: The prospective randomized study included 50 patients who underwent VATS lung resection between March 2015 and June 2015. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: experimental group (using the silicone fluted drain tubes for chest drainage) and control group (using standard drain tubes for chest drainage). The volume and characteristics of drainage, postoperative (PO) pain scores and hospital stay were recorded. All patients received standard care during hospital admission. RESULTS: In accordance with the exit criteria, three patients were excluded from study. The remaining 47 patients included in the final analysis were divided into two groups: experiment group (N=24) and control group (N=23). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, height, weight, clinical diagnosis and type of surgical procedure. There was a trend toward less PO pain in experimental group on postoperative day (POD) 1, with a statistically significant difference. Patients in experimental group had a reduced occurrence of fever [temperature (T) >37.4 °C] compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The silicone fluted drain tube is feasible and safe and may relieve patient PO pain and reduce occurrence of fever without the added risk of PO complications.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a modified silicone fluted drain tube after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection. METHODS: The prospective randomized study included 50 patients who underwent VATS lung resection between March 2015 and June 2015. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: experimental group (using the silicone fluted drain tubes for chest drainage) and control group (using standard drain tubes for chest drainage). The volume and characteristics of drainage, postoperative (PO) pain scores and hospital stay were recorded. All patients received standard care during hospital admission. RESULTS: In accordance with the exit criteria, three patients were excluded from study. The remaining 47 patients included in the final analysis were divided into two groups: experiment group (N=24) and control group (N=23). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, height, weight, clinical diagnosis and type of surgical procedure. There was a trend toward less PO pain in experimental group on postoperative day (POD) 1, with a statistically significant difference. Patients in experimental group had a reduced occurrence of fever [temperature (T) >37.4 °C] compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The silicone fluted drain tube is feasible and safe and may relieve patient PO pain and reduce occurrence of fever without the added risk of PO complications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Modified silicone fluted drain tube; postoperative pain (PO pain); thoracic drainage; video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)
Authors: X M Mueller; F Tinguely; H T Tevaearai; P Ravussin; F Stumpe; L K von Segesser Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: A Terzi; B Feil; C Bonadiman; A Lonardoni; I Spilimbergo; S Pergher; P Scanagatta; F Calabrò Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Joseph Alex; Junaid Ansari; Pradeep Bahalkar; Sandeep Agarwala; Mazhar Ur Rehman; Ahmed Saleh; Michael E Cowen Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.330