| Literature DB >> 26941841 |
Wei Tao1, Xiaowei Zeng2, Jun Wu3, Xi Zhu4, Xinghua Yu5, Xudong Zhang6, Jinxie Zhang2, Gan Liu2, Lin Mei2.
Abstract
In this study, we reported a simple polydopamine (Entities:
Keywords: Aptamer; Cancer targeting; Dopamine; Enhanced therapeutic effects.; Nanomedicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26941841 PMCID: PMC4775858 DOI: 10.7150/thno.14184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1(A) Synthesis of aptamer-conjugated polydopamine film through Oxidative Polymerization and Michael Addition Reaction. (B) Schematic illustration of the preparation procedure of the targeted Apt-pD-DTX/NPs.
Characterization of DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs.
| Samples (n=3) | Size (nm) | PDI | ZP (mV) | LC (%) | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTX/NPs | 99.3 ± 2.9 | 0.117 | -12.7 ± 3.2 | 10.13 ± 0.39 | 96.97 ± 1.78 |
PDI = polydispersity index, ZP = zeta potential, LC = loading content, EE = encapsulation efficiency, n=3.
Figure 2Characterization of all kinds of NPs. TEM images of (A) DTX/NPs, (B) pD-DTX/NPs and (C) Apt-pD-DTX/NPs. (D) - (F) Local images in the box are shown in the low panel. (G) Stability of DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), respectively, by monitoring particle size over a span of two weeks (n = 3). (H) FTIR spectra of NPs, pD/NPs and Apt-pD/NPs.
Figure 3XPS spectra of NPs, pD/NPs and Apt-pD/NPs. (A) - (C) narrow scan for N1s peaks. (D) - (F) narrow scan for C1s peaks.
Figure 4In vitro drug release profile of DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs in media with different pH value: (A) pH 7.4; (B) pH 6.5; (C) pH 5.0. (D) Photos of DTX/NPs (left), pD-DTX/NPs (middle) and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs (right) solutions.
Figure 5Endocytosis of C6/NPs, pD-C6/NPs and Apt-pD-C6/NPs. (A) CLSM images of MCF-7 and LNCaP cells after 2 h-incubation. (B) Cellular uptake efficiency of C6/NPs, pD-C6/NPs and Apt-pD-C6/NPs in MCF-7 cells after 2 h-incubation. (C) FCM histograms for C6/NPs, pD-C6/NPs and Apt-pD-C6/NPs in MCF-7 cells after 1 h-incubation. Cytotoxicity of NPs detected by MTT assays. Viability of MCF-7 cells cultured with DTX-loaded NPs in comparison with that of Taxotere® at the same DTX dose and drug-free NPs with the same amount of NPs for (D) 24 h and (E) 48 h (t-test, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001).
IC50 values of Taxotere®, DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs on MCF-7 cells after 24 h- and 48 h-incubation.
| Incubation time (h) | IC50 (μg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxotere® | DTX/NPs | pD-DTX/NPs | Apt-pD-DTX/NPs | |
| 24 | 18.39 ± 1.41 | 20.13 ± 1.48 | 20.64 ± 1.67 | 12.72 ± 0.59 |
| 48 | 13.69 ± 0.98 | 6.28 ± 0.47 | 6.88 ± 0.51 | 1.69 ± 0.09 |
Figure 6DTX concentration-time profile following intravenous administration of Taxotere®, DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs in SD rats at the DTX dose of 10 mg/kg (n = 5).
Pharmacokinetics in SD rats after i.v. administration of Taxotere®, DTX/NPs, pD-DTX/NPs and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs at the same 10 mg/kg drug dose.
| Parameters | Taxotere® | DTX/NPs | pD-DTX/NPs | Apt-pD-DTX/NPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cmax (ng/ml) | 1028.935 | 5950.842 | 5366.556 | 5875.360 |
| T1/2 (h) | 0.193 | 2.432 | 2.139 | 2.246 |
| AUC0-inf (ng/ml*h) | 1028.935 | 52059.121 | 46045.746 | 48568.713 |
| MRT (h) | 0.216 | 22.118 | 19.032 | 19.726 |
Figure 7In vivo imaging and biodistribution analysis of SCID mice bearing MCF-7 cells xenograft after tail vein injected of free IR-780, pD-IR-780/NPs and Apt-pD-IR-780/NPs. (A) Time-lapse NIR fluorescence images of nude mice. The tumors were circled with dotted line. (B) NIR fluorescence intensity of tumors was quantified at indicated time points. (C) NIR fluorescence images of major organs and tumors after injection at 24 h. (D) Semiquantitative biodistribution of free IR-780, pD-IR-780/NPs and Apt-pD-IR-780/NPs in nude mice determined by the averaged fluorescence intensity of organs and tumors.
Figure 8Anti-tumor efficacy of Taxotere®, pD-DTX/NPs, and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs on the SCID nude mice bearing MCF-7 xenograft. (A) Images of tumors in each group taken out from the sacrificed mice at the end point of research. Lane 1, Saline; Lane 2, Taxotere®; Lane 3, pD-DTX/NPs; Lane 4, Apt-pD-DTX/NPs. (B) Tumor growth curve after intravenously injected with Saline, Taxotere®, pD-DTX/NPs, and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs (t-test, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). (C) Tumor weight of each group taken out from the sacrificed mice at the end of the study (t-test, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001). (D) Weight change curve of the SCID nude mice bearing MCF-7 cells xenograft after intravenously injected with Saline, Taxotere®, pD-DTX/NPs, and Apt-pD-DTX/NPs.