Literature DB >> 26941141

Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CFL1, a Lactic Acid Bacterium Isolated from French Handcrafted Fermented Milk.

Julie Meneghel1, Eric Dugat-Bony1, Françoise Irlinger1, Valentin Loux2, Marie Vidal3, Stéphanie Passot1, Catherine Béal1, Séverine Layec1, Fernanda Fonseca4.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (L. bulgaricus) is a lactic acid bacterium widely used for the production of yogurt and cheeses. Here, we report the genome sequence of L. bulgaricus CFL1 to improve our knowledge on its stress-induced damages following production and end-use processes.
Copyright © 2016 Meneghel et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26941141      PMCID: PMC4777752          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00052-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (L. bulgaricus) is a lactic acid bacterium that is traditionally used as a dairy starter. L. bulgaricus is mainly involved in milk acidification and more generally plays a role in the preservation and development of flavor, texture, and vitamins of dairy products (1, 2). In addition, this bacterium is exploited to produce lactic acid for use in the food, cosmetics, and chemical sectors (3). Aimed at enhancing its industrial utilization, considerable research efforts have been undertaken to characterize the diversity of L. bulgaricus strains. Since 2006, the genome sequences of six different strains were published: ATCC 11842 (1), ATCC BAA-365 (4), 2038 (5), CNCM I-1519 and CNCM I-1632 (6), and CRL871 (7). Actually, the production of lactic acid bacteria by traditional fermentation, their stabilization (by freezing and/or drying methods), and final use (in yogurt, cheese-making, or biomolecule production) are responsible for the undesirable degradation of their viability and functionality. Therefore, scientific work has also focused on optimizing the formulation and operating conditions of starter production and the study of L. bulgaricus behavior under related stress conditions, especially considering the sensitive strain CFL1 (8–16). However, the majority of these studies are descriptive, and there is a clear need for comprehension of the underlying molecular cellular damage mechanisms. Consequently, we sequenced the genome of L. bulgaricus CFL1 (available at CIRM-BIA, Rennes, France), isolated >20 years ago from handcrafted fermented milk, by using Illumina MiSeq technology. Paired-end sequences (2 × 250-bp long) were merged using FLASH (17) and assembled using SPAdes (version 3.1.1, with default parameters) (18), which generated 44 large contigs (>1,000 bp), with an average sequencing coverage of 115-fold, N50 contig of 116 Kbp, and a largest contig of 266 Kbp. The unclosed draft genome is 1,757,917 bp in length and has a G+C content of 49.8%. Gene prediction and annotation were performed using the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system (19), according to the standard operating procedure of the Department of Energy-Joint Genome Institute (DOE-JGI) microbial genome annotation pipeline (MGAP version 4) (20). The genome is composed of 1,882 predicted genes comprising 1,794 coding DNA sequences, 20 rRNAs, and 68 tRNAs. The analysis of the genome of L. bulgaricus CFL1 revealed general consistency with previously sequenced strains, including G+C content, carbohydrate metabolism, and genes involved in exopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide production. However, a disparity regarding the detected clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) systems should be emphasized. They consist of defense systems against plasmid and phage invasions that are classified into three major groups (types I, II, and III) (21). Whereas in L. bulgaricus, only type II or III seems to be present, if any (22), interestingly, CFL1 appeared to possess both of these CRISPR-Cas system types simultaneously. The availability of the genome sequence and annotation of L. bulgaricus CFL1 will allow a deeper insight into its stress response mechanisms, thus making it possible to identify potential preservation issues and to better understand cell damages following production and end-use processes, especially through transcriptomic and proteomic approaches.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequences of L. bulgaricus CFL1 have been deposited at the EMBL database under accession numbers CZPS01000001 to CZPS01000044.
  18 in total

1.  Method of quantifying the loss of acidification activity of lactic acid starters during freezing and frozen storage.

Authors:  F Fonseca; C Béal; G Corrieu
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 2.  CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation.

Authors:  Devaki Bhaya; Michelle Davison; Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  The complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus bulgaricus reveals extensive and ongoing reductive evolution.

Authors:  M van de Guchte; S Penaud; C Grimaldi; V Barbe; K Bryson; P Nicolas; C Robert; S Oztas; S Mangenot; A Couloux; V Loux; R Dervyn; R Bossy; A Bolotin; J-M Batto; T Walunas; J-F Gibrat; P Bessières; J Weissenbach; S D Ehrlich; E Maguin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fermentation pH influences the physiological-state dynamics of Lactobacillus bulgaricus CFL1 during pH-controlled culture.

Authors:  Aline Rault; Marielle Bouix; Catherine Béal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Origin of acetaldehyde during milk fermentation using (13)C-labeled precursors.

Authors:  A Ott; J E Germond; A Chaintreau
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  The impact of a consortium of fermented milk strains on the gut microbiome of gnotobiotic mice and monozygotic twins.

Authors:  Nathan P McNulty; Tanya Yatsunenko; Ansel Hsiao; Jeremiah J Faith; Brian D Muegge; Andrew L Goodman; Bernard Henrissat; Raish Oozeer; Stéphanie Cools-Portier; Guillaume Gobert; Christian Chervaux; Dan Knights; Catherine A Lozupone; Rob Knight; Alexis E Duncan; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Christopher B Newgard; Andrew C Heath; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Effect of sucrose and maltodextrin on the physical properties and survival of air-dried Lactobacillus bulgaricus: an in situ fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Harriëtte Oldenhof; Willem F Wolkers; Fernanda Fonseca; Stéphanie Passot; Michèle Marin
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2005 May-Jun

8.  Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  K Makarova; A Slesarev; Y Wolf; A Sorokin; B Mirkin; E Koonin; A Pavlov; N Pavlova; V Karamychev; N Polouchine; V Shakhova; I Grigoriev; Y Lou; D Rohksar; S Lucas; K Huang; D M Goodstein; T Hawkins; V Plengvidhya; D Welker; J Hughes; Y Goh; A Benson; K Baldwin; J-H Lee; I Díaz-Muñiz; B Dosti; V Smeianov; W Wechter; R Barabote; G Lorca; E Altermann; R Barrangou; B Ganesan; Y Xie; H Rawsthorne; D Tamir; C Parker; F Breidt; J Broadbent; R Hutkins; D O'Sullivan; J Steele; G Unlu; M Saier; T Klaenhammer; P Richardson; S Kozyavkin; B Weimer; D Mills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stabilization of frozen Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in glycerol suspensions: Freezing kinetics and storage temperature effects.

Authors:  F Fonseca; M Marin; G J Morris
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  A low membrane lipid phase transition temperature is associated with a high cryotolerance of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus CFL1.

Authors:  J Gautier; S Passot; C Pénicaud; H Guillemin; S Cenard; P Lieben; F Fonseca
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.