Mary A Hobbs1, Susan Robinson1, David M Neyens2, Connie Steed3. 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. Electronic address: dneyens@clemson.edu. 3. Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospital visitors' hand hygiene (HH) is an important aspect of preventing health care-associated infections, but little is known about visitors' use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (AHS). The study aim was to examine if use of AHS is influenced by visitor characteristics and the location of AHS within the lobby of a large hospital. METHODS: An observational study was conducted with AHS placed in 3 different locations. The data included visitor characteristics and if AHS were used. RESULTS: The results suggest that visitors are 5.28 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68-7.82) more likely to use AHS when dispensers are located in the middle of the lobby with limited landmarks or barriers, 1.35 times more likely to use the AHS in the afternoon compared with the morning, or when they are younger visitors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97). Individuals in a group are more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.84) to use AHS. DISCUSSION: In addition to location, time of day, and age, there is a group effect that results in visitors being more likely to use AHS when in a group. The increased use related to groups may serve as a mechanism to encourage visitor HH. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest future research opportunities to investigate the effect of group dynamics and social pressure on visitor AHS use and to identify strategies for improving visitor HH.
BACKGROUND: Hospital visitors' hand hygiene (HH) is an important aspect of preventing health care-associated infections, but little is known about visitors' use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (AHS). The study aim was to examine if use of AHS is influenced by visitor characteristics and the location of AHS within the lobby of a large hospital. METHODS: An observational study was conducted with AHS placed in 3 different locations. The data included visitor characteristics and if AHS were used. RESULTS: The results suggest that visitors are 5.28 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68-7.82) more likely to use AHS when dispensers are located in the middle of the lobby with limited landmarks or barriers, 1.35 times more likely to use the AHS in the afternoon compared with the morning, or when they are younger visitors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97). Individuals in a group are more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.84) to use AHS. DISCUSSION: In addition to location, time of day, and age, there is a group effect that results in visitors being more likely to use AHS when in a group. The increased use related to groups may serve as a mechanism to encourage visitor HH. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest future research opportunities to investigate the effect of group dynamics and social pressure on visitor AHS use and to identify strategies for improving visitor HH.
Authors: W Matthew Linam; Elizabeth M Marrero; Michele D Honeycutt; Christy M Wisdom; Anna Gaspar; Vini Vijayan Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-12-16
Authors: Yolisa Nalule; Helen Buxton; Alison Macintyre; Por Ir; Ponnary Pors; Channa Samol; Supheap Leang; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Qi Zhen; Anxiao Zhang; Qiong Huang; Jing Li; Yiming Du; Qi Zhang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.614