Literature DB >> 26940248

Prevalence of malocclusion traits and orthodontic treatment in a Finnish adult population.

Laura Krooks1, Pertti Pirttiniemi1,2, Georgios Kanavakis3, Raija Lähdesmäki1,2.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of malocclusion traits and the extent of orthodontic treatment in a Finnish adult population. Materials and methods The study population comprised subjects (n = 1964) from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 living in the city of Oulu and within 100 km of it. A clinical oral and dental examination with registration of occlusion was carried out in 2012 in connection with a 46-year follow-up survey. Data on previous orthodontic treatment were collected based on a questionnaire. Results In the clinical examination, 39.5% of the subjects had at least one malocclusion trait. The most common malocclusion traits were lateral crossbite (17.9%), overbite ≥ 6 mm (11.7%) and overjet ≥ 6 mm (9.7%). Crossbite on the left premolars, negative overjet and increased overbite were found more frequently in men. The prevalence of malocclusion traits was at the same level in treated and untreated groups. Overall, 18.6% of the subjects had undergone orthodontic treatment. Women showed a significantly higher prevalence of orthodontic treatment. Conclusions The most common malocclusion trait in the present study was lateral crossbite. Significant male dominance in the prevalence of malocclusion was observed, which has not been reported earlier in Finland. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusion traits was more common among females in Northern Finland. This study indicates that orthodontic treatment provided in childhood was, on average, adequate in reducing malocclusion traits to the level observed in the general population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort studies; epidemiology; malocclusion; orthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940248     DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2016.1151547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of condyle, masseter and temporal muscles volumes in patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sandra Lucia Golin; Nailu Angélica Sinicato; Karyna Valle-Corotti; Acácio Fuziy; Ana Carla Nahas-Scocate; Simone Appenzeller; Andre Luiz Ferreira Costa
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05-16

2.  Evaluation of effectiveness and stability of aligner treatments using the Peer Assessment Rating Index.

Authors:  Isabelle Graf; Carolin Puppe; Jörg Schwarze; Karolin Höfer; Hildegard Christ; Bert Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Evaluation of the orthodontic treatment need in a paediatric sample from Southern Italy and its importance among paediatricians for improving oral health in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  Valeria Luzzi; Gaetano Ierardo; Denise Corridore; Gabriele Di Carlo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Emanuele Leonardi; Guglielmo-Giuseppe Campus; Iole Vozza; Antonella Polimeni; Maurizio Bossù
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 4.  Applications of stem cells in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: Current trends and future perspectives.

Authors:  Shiva Safari; Arezoo Mahdian; Saeed Reza Motamedian
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Orthodontic Treatment Planning based on Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Peilin Li; Deyu Kong; Tian Tang; Di Su; Pu Yang; Huixia Wang; Zhihe Zhao; Yang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Malocclusion severity and its associations with oral health-related quality of life in an adult population.

Authors:  Linnea Närhi; Mimmi Tolvanen; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Anna-Sofia Silvola
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.131

7.  Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.

Authors:  I Graf; N C Bock; T Bartzela; V Röper; U Schumann; K Reck; H Christ; K Höfer; U Fritz; D Wiechmann; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; M Wolf; S Ruf; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.341

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.