Literature DB >> 26940132

Antigen delivery via hydrophilic PEG-b-PAGE-b-PLGA nanoparticles boosts vaccination induced T cell immunity.

René Rietscher1, Matthias Schröder2, Julia Janke3, Justyna Czaplewska4, Michael Gottschaldt4, Regina Scherließ3, Andrea Hanefeld5, Ulrich S Schubert4, Marc Schneider6, Percy A Knolle7, Claus-Michael Lehr8.   

Abstract

Here, we evaluate the use of hydrophilic PEG-b-PAGE-b-PLGA (PPP) for the preparation of antigen loaded nanoparticles (NPs) as a platform for prophylactic vaccination. To investigate the suitability of PPP-NPs for antigen delivery, we used the double emulsion evaporation technique to prepare NPs of different sizes, antigen-loading efficiencies and -release kinetics for the model antigen Ovalbumin (OVA). Prior to applying the PPP-NPs in biological in vitro or in vivo models, all materials were tested for absence of cytotoxicity and endotoxins. While the uptake of NPs in antigen presenting cells was size but not polymer dependent, the efficiency of cross presentation of NP-associated antigen on MHC I molecules for CD8 T cell activation depended on the polymer type. T cell activation by antigen-presenting cells was significantly increased in vitro if antigen was delivered via PPP NPs compared to PLGA NPs or soluble OVA, although antigen content was the same in all tested formulations. Subcutaneous application of PPP-OVA-NPs even without adjuvants led to generation of potent CD8 T cell-mediated OVA-specific cytotoxicity in vivo that was more pronounced than after application of OVA alone or PLGA-OVA-NPs. Our data suggest that PPP-NPs can serve as platform for antigen-delivery in future vaccination formulations. Although PPP-NPs already bear intrinsic adjuvant-function, the complementation with TLR ligands loaded inside NPs may further strengthen the immune response to a point, where it might be possible to use it as a therapeutic vaccine to break immune tolerance in chronic disease states.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular uptake; Nanomedicines; Poly(allyl glycidyl ether); Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide); Polyethylene glycol; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940132     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  15 in total

Review 1.  Nanovaccines for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Shuibin Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Guizhi Zhu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2019-06-06

Review 2.  Synthetic nanovaccines for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Min Luo; Layla Z Samandi; Zhaohui Wang; Zhijian J Chen; Jinming Gao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Nanomedicine approaches to improve cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hui Qiu; Yuanzeng Min; Zach Rodgers; Longzhen Zhang; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 4.  Nanotechnology-based immunotherapies to combat cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Yuping Zhao; Muhammad Bilal; Maimoona Qindeel; Muhammad Imran Khan; Kuldeep Dhama; Hafiz M N Iqbal
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  A versatile photothermal vaccine based on acid-responsive glyco-nanoplatform for synergistic therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Yanan Gao; Qingyu Zhao; Min Xiao; Xuefei Huang; Xuanjun Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 15.304

6.  Synthetic vaccine particles for durable cytolytic T lymphocyte responses and anti-tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Petr O Ilyinskii; Grigoriy I Kovalev; Conlin P O'Neil; Christopher J Roy; Alicia M Michaud; Natalia M Drefs; Mikhail A Pechenkin; Fen-Ni Fu; Lloyd P M Johnston; Dmitry A Ovchinnikov; Takashi Kei Kishimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Antileishmanial Activity of Amphotericin B-loaded-PLGA Nanoparticles: An Overview.

Authors:  Ernesto Palma; Antonella Pasqua; Agnese Gagliardi; Domenico Britti; Massimo Fresta; Donato Cosco
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Immunotoxicity Considerations for Next Generation Cancer Nanomedicines.

Authors:  Gary Hannon; Joanne Lysaght; Neill J Liptrott; Adriele Prina-Mello
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 9.  Polymeric Micelles in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zhuoya Wan; Ruohui Zheng; Pearl Moharil; Yuzhe Liu; Jing Chen; Runzi Sun; Xu Song; Qiang Ao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Polymer-Based Nanovaccines.

Authors:  Natassa Pippa; Maria Gazouli; Stergios Pispas
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.