| Literature DB >> 26939916 |
Rogers Ssebunya1, Joseph K B Matovu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that use of motorcycle ambulances can help to improve health facility deliveries; however, few studies have explored the motivators for and barriers to their usage. We explored the factors associated with utilization of motorcycle ambulances by pregnant women in eastern Uganda.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26939916 PMCID: PMC4778302 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0808-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Characteristics of the study population
| Variable |
| Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age group | ||
| 15–24 | 187 | 47.8 |
| 25–34 | 147 | 37.6 |
| 35+ | 57 | 14.6 |
| Education level | ||
| ≤ Primary Level | 278 | 71.1 |
| ≥ Secondary Level | 113 | 28.9 |
| Marital status | ||
| Currently married/living together | 362 | 92.6 |
| Otherb | 29 | 7.4 |
| Religion | ||
| Anglican | 170 | 43.5 |
| Catholics | 75 | 19.2 |
| Muslims | 108 | 27.6 |
| Other Christiansa | 38 | 9.7 |
| Tribe | ||
| Bagisu | 322 | 82.4 |
| Other tribe | 69 | 17.7 |
| Occupation of the woman | ||
| Peasant | 339 | 86.7 |
| Business woman | 25 | 6.4 |
| Other occupation | 27 | 6.9 |
| Estimated monthly income | ||
| <50,000 | 208 | 53.2 |
| ≥50,000 | 183 | 46.8 |
| Use of mA | ||
| Yes | 189 | 48.3 |
| No | 202 | 51.7 |
| Health facility level | ||
| Health Center IV | 258 | 66.0 |
| Health Center III | 133 | 34.0 |
a − Pentecostals and Seventh Day Adventists, b − Never married, Divorced/separated, widowed
Characteristics of motorcycle ambulance users and non-users by socio-demographic characteristics
| Used mA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes ( | No ( |
| |
| Variable | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Age group | 0.001* | ||
| 15–24 | 67 (35.5) | 120 (59.4) | |
| 25–34 | 79 (41.8) | 68 (33.7) | |
| 35+ | 43 (22.8) | 14 (6.9) | |
| Mean Age(SD) | 26.4 (6.9) | 26.3 (6.82) | |
| Religion | 0.039* | ||
| Anglican | 77 (40.7) | 93 (46.0) | |
| Catholics | 46 (24.3) | 29 (14.4) | |
| Muslims | 45 (23.8) | 63 (31.2) | |
| Other Christians | 21 (11.1) | 17 (8.4) | |
| Tribe | |||
| Bagisu | 168 (88.9) | 154 (76.2) | 0.001* |
| Other tribe | 21 (11.1) | 48 (23.8) | |
| Education level | 0.890 | ||
| ≤ Primary Level | 135 (71.4) | 143 (70.8) | |
| ≥ Secondary Level | 54 (28.6) | 59 (29.2) | |
| Occupation | 0.167 | ||
| Peasant | 170 (90.0) | 169 (83.7) | |
| Business woman | 10 (5.3) | 15 (7.4) | |
| Other occupation | 9 (4.8) | 18 (8.9) | |
| Marital status | 0.121** | ||
| Currently married/ Living together | 179 (94.7) | 183 (90.6) | |
| Othersa | 10 (5.29) | 19 (9.4) | |
| Monthly Income | 0.357 | ||
| <50,000 | 96 (50.8) | 112 (55.5) | |
| ≥50,000 | 93 (49.2) | 90 (44.55) | |
**significant at p < 0.2, *significant at p < 0.05, aNever married, divorced, separated or widowed
Association between utilization of motorcycle ambulances by pregnant women and socio-demographic characteristics
| Used mA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Yes n (%) | No n (%) | Unadjusted OR | 95 % CI |
|
| Age group | |||||
| 15–24 | 67 (35.5) | 120 (59.4) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| 25–34 | 79 (41.8) | 68 (33.7) | 2.1 | 1.34–3.23 | 0.001* |
| 35+ | 43 (22.8) | 14 (6.9) | 5.50 | 2.81–10.78 | 0.001* |
| Religion | |||||
| Anglican | 77 (40.7) | 93 (46.0) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Catholic | 46 (24.3) | 29 (14.4) | 1.92 | 1.10–3.33 | 0.021* |
| Muslims | 45 (23.8) | 63 (31.2) | 0.86 | 0.53–1.40 | 0.553 |
| Other Christians | 21 (11.1) | 17 (8.4) | 1.49 | 0.74–3.03 | 0.267 |
| Tribe | |||||
| Other Tribe | 21 (11.1) | 48 (23.8) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Bagisu | 168 (88.9) | 154 (76.2) | 2.49 | 1.43–4.35 | 0.001* |
| Marital status | |||||
| Others | 10 (5.29) | 19 (9.4) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Married, Living together | 179 (94.7) | 183 (90.6) | 1.86 | 0.84–4.11 | 0.126** |
| Sharing birth plan with husband | |||||
| No | 16 (8.5) | 51 (25.3) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 173 (91.5) | 151 (74.8) | 3.65 | 2.0–6.67 | 0.001* |
| Husband participation in using mA | |||||
| No | 49 (25.9) | 115 (56.9) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 140 (74.1) | 87 (43.1) | 3.78 | 2.46–5.80 | 0.001* |
| Would consult HW first before using mA | |||||
| No | 149 (78.8) | 121 (59.9) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 40 (21.2) | 81 (40.1) | 0.40 | 0.26–0.63 | 0.001* |
| Consulted TBA before using mA | |||||
| No | 175 (92.6) | 171 (84.7) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 14 (7.4) | 31 (15.4) | 0.44 | 0.23–0.86 | 0.016* |
| mA tends to delay | |||||
| Disagree | 144 (76.2) | 137 (67.8) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Agree | 45 (23.8) | 65 (32.2) | 0.66 | 0.42–1.02 | 0.067** |
| Culture allows a pregnant woman to sit on a motorcycle | |||||
| No | 36 (19.1) | 27 (13.4) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 153 (90.0) | 175 (86.6) | 0.66 | 0.38–1.13 | 0.127** |
| ANC visit | |||||
| ≤3 visits | 36 (19.1) | 63 (31.2) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| ≥4 visits | 153 (81.0) | 139 (68.8) | 1.93 | 1.20–3.08 | 0.006* |
| Presence of obstetric drugs/ supplies in health facility | |||||
| No | 45 (23.8) | 30 (14.9) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 144 (76.2) | 172 (85.2) | 0.56 | 0.33–0.93 | 0.025* |
| Prefer mA to be escorted with midwife | |||||
| Disagree | 13 (6.9) | 34 (16.8) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Agree | 176 (93.1) | 168 (83.2) | 2.74 | 1.40–5.37 | 0.003* |
| Discussed with TBA first before transit | |||||
| No | 100 (52.9) | 162 (80.2) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 89 (47.1) | 40 (19.8) | 3.60 | 2.30–5.65 | 0.001* |
| Opinion that drivers’ attitudes are very poor | |||||
| Agree | 166 (87.8) | 196 (97.0) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Disagree | 23 (12.2) | 6 (3.0) | 0.22 | 0.09–0.56 | 0.001* |
| Living far away from HF with mA | |||||
| Disagree | 50 (26.5) | 78 (38.6) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Agree | 139 (73.5) | 124 (61.4) | 1.75 | 1.14–2.69 | 0.011* |
| Opinion that mA drivers have some obstetric skills | |||||
| No | 19 (10.1) | 40 (19.8) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
| Yes | 170 (90) | 162 (80.2) | 2.21 | 1.23–3.97 | 0.008* |
** significant at p < 0.2 , *significant at p < 0.05
Crude and adjusted Odds ratios of utilization of motorcycle ambulance and covariates
| Variable | Number | Percent | UOR | 95 % CI | aOR | 95 % CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | 15–24 (ref) | 67 | 35.5 | 1.0 | ||||
| 25–34 | 79 | 41.8 | 2.1 | 1.34–3.23 | 1.84 | 1.12–3.04 | 0.017* | |
| 35 | 43 | 22.8 | 5.5 | 2.81–10.78 | 4.30 | 2.03–9.13 | 0.001* | |
| Sharing a birth plan with husband | No (ref) | 16 | 8.5 | |||||
| Yes | 173 | 91.5 | 3.7 | 2.0–6.67 | 2.5 | 1.19–5.26 | 0.016* | |
| Husband’s participation in a woman’s decision to use mA | No (ref) | 49 | 25.9 | |||||
| Yes | 140 | 74.1 | 3.8 | 2.46–5.80 | 3.22 | 1.92–5.38 | 0.001* | |
| Pregnant women preferring a midwife to escort mA | No (ref) | 13 | 6.9 | |||||
| Yes | 176 | 93.1 | 2.7 | 1.40–5.37 | 3.1 | 1.41–6.79 | 0.005* | |
| Discussed with TBA first on how to come to HF | No (ref) | 100 | 52.9 | |||||
| Yes | 89 | 47.1 | 3.6 | 2.30–5.65 | 3.12 | 1.88–5.19 | 0.001* | |
| Women’s opinion that driver’s attitudes are poor | Agree (ref) | 166 | 87.8 | |||||
| Disagree | 23 | 12.2 | 0.22 | 0.09–0.56 | 0.23 | 0.08–0.70 | 0.009* | |
| Women’s opinion that drivers have some obstetric skillsa | No (ref) | 19 | 10.1 | |||||
| Yes | 170 | 90.0 | 2.2 | 1.23–3.97 | 1.93 | 0.97–3.85 | 0.063 |
UOR Unadjusted Odds Ratio, HF Health facility, TBA Traditional Birth Attendant
aDrivers’ skills here meant the ability to provide any emergence help while woman is in labour like conducting the delivery, * P < 0.05 and Significant at 95 % confidence interval