Literature DB >> 26939906

Correlates of psychological care strategies for people with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2(™) ) study.

R I G Holt1, A Nicolucci2, K Kovacs Burns3, G Lucisano2, S E Skovlund4, A Forbes5, S Kalra6, E Menéndez Torre7, N Munro8, M Peyrot9.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the ways in which healthcare professionals address psychological problems of adults with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2(™) ) study.
METHODS: Approximately 120 primary care physicians, 80 diabetes specialists and 80 nurses and dietitians providing diabetes care participated in each of 17 countries (N=4785). Multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate independent statistically significant associations of respondent attributes concerning psychological care strategies, including assessment of diabetes impact on the patient's life, assessment of depression, provision of psychological assessment and support, and coordination with mental health professionals.
RESULTS: Psychological care strategies were positively associated with each other but differed by healthcare practice site and discipline; nurses and dietitians were less likely to assess depression than other healthcare professionals, while primary care physicians were less likely to coordinate with mental health specialists or ask patients how diabetes affects their lives. Psychological care was positively associated with healthcare professionals' beliefs that patients need help dealing with emotional issues and that clinical success depends on doing so, and also with level of psychological care training, multidisciplinary team membership and availability of resources for psychological care. There were significant between-country variations in psychological care strategies, before and after adjustment for individual-level factors, and significant country-by-covariate interactions for almost all individual-level factors investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in training and resources, recognition and assessment of psychological problems, and increased belief in the efficacy of psychological support may enhance healthcare professionals' efforts to address psychological problems in adults with diabetes.
© 2016 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26939906     DOI: 10.1111/dme.13109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  5 in total

1.  A Facilitated Web-Based Self-Management Tool for People With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Insulin Pump: Intervention Development Using the Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Claire Reidy; Claire Foster; Anne Rogers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  The Internal Realities of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Mediators Influencing Self-Management Beliefs via Grounded Theory Approach.

Authors:  Yogarabindranath Swarna Nantha; Shamsul Haque; Azriel Abisheg Paul Chelliah; Anuar Zaini Md Zain; Gan Kim Yen
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

3.  The internal realities of individuals with type 2 diabetes-Psychological disposition in self-management behaviour via grounded theory approach.

Authors:  Yogarabindranath Swarna Nantha; Azriel Abisheg Paul Chelliah; Shamsul Haque; Anuar Zaini Md Zain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is it time to consider depression as a major complication of type 2 diabetes? Evidence from a large population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Rossella Messina; Marica Iommi; Paola Rucci; Chiara Reno; Maria Pia Fantini; Carlotta Lunghi; Mattia Altini; Francesca Bravi; Simona Rosa; Antonio Nicolucci; Paolo Di Bartolo
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  A co-design study to develop supportive interventions to improve psychological and social adaptation among adults with new-onset type 1 diabetes in Denmark and the UK.

Authors:  Mette Due-Christensen; Lene Eide Joensen; Sophie Sarre; Ewa Romanczuk; Julie Lindberg Wad; Rita Forde; Glenn Robert; Ingrid Willaing; Angus Forbes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.