Literature DB >> 26939830

Efficacy of Chemical Mimicry by Aphid Predators Depends on Aphid-Learning by Ants.

Masayuki Hayashi1, Masashi Nomura2, Kiyoshi Nakamuta3.   

Abstract

Chemical mimicry is an effective strategy when signal receivers recognize and discriminate models by relying on chemical cues. Some aphid enemies mimic the cuticular chemicals of aphids through various means thus avoiding detection and attack by aphid-tending ants. However, because ants have been reported to learn the chemical signatures of aphids in order to distinguish the aphids, the efficacy of chemical mimicry is predicted to depend on the experience of the ants that had tended aphids. The present study tested this hypothesis using two predator species: larvae of the green lacewing Mallada desjardinsi, and larvae of the ladybeetle Scymnus posticalis. Lacewing larvae carry the carcasses of aphids on which they have preyed upon their backs, and these function via chemical camouflage to reduce the aggressiveness of aphid-tending ants toward the larvae. Ladybeetle larvae reportedly produce a covering of wax structures, and their chemicals appear to attenuate ant aggression. We examined whether the behavior of the ant Tetramorium tsushimae toward these predators changed depending on their aphid-tending experience. Ants moderated their aggressiveness toward both predators when they had previously tended aphids, indicating that chemical mimicry by both aphid predators is dependent on previous experience of the ants in tending aphids. Chemical mimicry by the predators of ant-tended aphids is therefore considered to exploit learning-dependent aphid recognition systems of ants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ant-aphid mutualism; Chemical communication; Chemical mimicry; Green lacewing; Recognition system; Scymnus beetle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26939830     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0676-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  6 in total

1.  Wax structures of Scymnus louisianae attenuate aggression from aphid-tending ants.

Authors:  Ezra G Schwartzberg; Kenneth F Haynes; Douglas W Johnson; Grayson C Brown
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.377

2.  Learning and discrimination of cuticular hydrocarbons in a social insect.

Authors:  Ellen van Wilgenburg; Antoine Felden; Dong-Hwan Choe; Robert Sulc; Jun Luo; Kenneth J Shea; Mark A Elgar; Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Pollinator attraction in a sexually deceptive orchid by means of unconventional chemicals.

Authors:  Manfred Ayasse; Florian P Schiestl; Hannes F Paulus; Fernando Ibarra; Wittko Francke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ants Learn Aphid Species as Mutualistic Partners: Is the Learning Behavior Species-Specific?

Authors:  Masayuki Hayashi; Kiyoshi Nakamuta; Masashi Nomura
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Do aphid carcasses on the backs of larvae of green lacewing work as chemical mimicry against aphid-tending ants?

Authors:  Masayuki Hayashi; Yasuyuki Choh; Kiyoshi Nakamuta; Masashi Nomura
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Ants use partner specific odors to learn to recognize a mutualistic partner.

Authors:  Masaru K Hojo; Ari Yamamoto; Toshiharu Akino; Kazuki Tsuji; Ryohei Yamaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.