Literature DB >> 26939714

Evaluation of damage induced by Kwkt and Pikt zymocins against Brettanomyces/Dekkera spoilage yeast, as compared to sulphur dioxide.

L Oro1, M Ciani1, D Bizzaro1, F Comitini1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Over the last few decades, the use of zymocins as biological tools to counteract contamination by spoilage yeast in beverages and food has been widely studied. This study examined the damage induced by the Kwkt and Pikt, two zymocins produced by Kluyeromyces wickerhamii and Wickerhanomyces anomalus, respectively, with antimicrobial activity against Brettanomyces/Dekkera wine-spoilage yeast. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The physiological and biochemical characterization of both of these proteins revealed that only Pikt showed a strict relationship between β-glucosidase activity and killer activity. The minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum fungicidal concentrations of Kwkt and Pikt showed inhibitory activities against Brettanomyces/Dekkera yeast. Cytofluorimetric evaluation of cell death was based on both cell membrane permeability and cell metabolism, using fluorescence techniques under increasing zymocin levels over different incubation times. The antimicrobial actions of Kwkt and Pikt were also compared with the mode of action of sulphur dioxide. In this last case, the induction of the viable but noncultivable (VBNC) state was confirmed, with the consequent recovery of Brettanomyces yeast after medium replacement. In contrast, Kwkt and Pikt caused irreversible death of these yeast, without recovery of sensitive cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Kwkt and Pikt could be proposed as fungistatic or fungicide biocontrol agents in winemaking to control the colonization and development of Brettanomyces/Dekkera yeasts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These data support the potential use of zymocins to reduce wine contamination as an alternative to sulphur dioxide that act on sensitive cells. Differently from sulphur dioxide, that could induce a reversible VBNC state, Kwkt and Pikt determine the irreversible damage on sensitive yeasts, ensuring the complete control of spoilage Brettanomyces yeast.
© 2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brettanomyces/Dekkera; antimicrobials; irreversible mode of action; viable but noncultivable; zymocins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26939714     DOI: 10.1111/jam.13121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  4 in total

1.  Effects of Exogenous Yeast and Bacteria on the Microbial Population Dynamics and Outcomes of Olive Fermentations.

Authors:  Jose Zaragoza; Zachary Bendiks; Charlotte Tyler; Mary E Kable; Thomas R Williams; Yelizaveta Luchkovska; Elaine Chow; Kyria Boundy-Mills; Maria L Marco
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 2.  The Biology of Pichia membranifaciens Killer Toxins.

Authors:  Ignacio Belda; Javier Ruiz; Alejandro Alonso; Domingo Marquina; Antonio Santos
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 3.  Microbial Resources as a Tool for Enhancing Sustainability in Winemaking.

Authors:  Tiziana Nardi
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 4.  Potential of Yeasts as Biocontrol Agents of the Phytopathogen Causing Cacao Witches' Broom Disease: Is Microbial Warfare a Solution?

Authors:  Pedro Ferraz; Fernanda Cássio; Cândida Lucas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.