Retinectomy vs vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in repair of posterior segment open-globe injuries with retinal incarceration.

PurposeTo evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with scleral buckling (SB) vs retinectomy in treating posterior segment open-globe injuries with retinal incarceration.MethodsPatients (38 eyes) with posterior segment open-globe injuries and retinal incarceration were identified, and they underwent either PPV combined with SB (PPV+SB, n=19) or retinectomy (n=19). The two groups were matched in the following categories: the severity of injury (including wound length), the location of the incarceration site and the presence of retinal detachment. Anatomic reattachment of the retina and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at the time of 12 months after operation.ResultsAt 12 months after operation, the PPV+SB group demonstrated a better anatomic retinal attachment rate (84.2% vs 68.4%, P=0.252) and BCVA (73.7% vs 47.4%, P=0.247) compared with the retinectomy group, however, the differences failed to reach statistical significance. Compared with the PPV+SB group, the rectinectomy group had significantly higher rates of hemorrhage (47.4% vs 15.8%, P=0.036), inflammation (42.1% vs 10.5%, P=0.027), and a lower intraocular pressure (IOP, 9.8±3.1 vs 13.6±4.1 mmHg, P=0.002) after silicone oil (SO) removal.ConclusionsFor patients with posterior segment open-globe injuries and retinal incarceration, PPV and SB treatments resulted in a better anatomic and functional outcome and less post-operation complications compared with the retinectomy.