Literature DB >> 26939544

Antarctic skuas recognize individual humans.

Won Young Lee1, Yeong-Deok Han2, Sang-Im Lee3,4, Piotr G Jablonski3,5, Jin-Woo Jung6,7, Jeong-Hoon Kim6.   

Abstract

Recent findings report that wild animals can recognize individual humans. To explain how the animals distinguish humans, two hypotheses are proposed. The high cognitive abilities hypothesis implies that pre-existing high intelligence enabled animals to acquire such abilities. The pre-exposure to stimuli hypothesis suggests that frequent encounters with humans promote the acquisition of discriminatory abilities in these species. Here, we examine individual human recognition abilities in a wild Antarctic species, the brown skua (Stercorarius antarcticus), which lives away from typical human settlements and was only recently exposed to humans due to activities at Antarctic stations. We found that, as nest visits were repeated, the skua parents responded at further distances and were more likely to attack the nest intruder. Also, we demonstrated that seven out of seven breeding pairs of skuas selectively responded to a human nest intruder with aggression and ignored a neutral human who had not previously approached the nest. The results indicate that Antarctic skuas, a species that typically inhabited in human-free areas, are able to recognize individual humans who disturbed their nests. Our findings generally support the high cognitive abilities hypothesis, but this ability can be acquired during a relatively short period in the life of an individual as a result of interactions between individual birds and humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antarctic bird; Brown skua; Cognition; Human recognition; Pre-exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26939544     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0970-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  5 in total

1.  Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.

Authors:  Samara Danel; Jules Chiffard-Carricaburu; Francesco Bonadonna; Anna P Nesterova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions.

Authors:  Roberta Salmi; Caroline E Jones; Jodi Carrigan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Repeatable aversion across threat types is linked with life-history traits but is dependent on how aversion is measured.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Michael S Reichert; Jodie M S Crane; William O'Shea; John L Quinn
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys.

Authors:  Emily M Leishman; Nienke van Staaveren; Vern R Osborne; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-07

5.  Predator or provider? How wild animals respond to mixed messages from humans.

Authors:  Madeleine Goumas; Neeltje J Boogert; Laura A Kelley; Thomas Holding
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.