| Literature DB >> 26938541 |
Jovan Gligorijevic1,2, Dragoljub Gajic3,4,5, Aleksandar Brkovic6,7, Ivana Savic-Gajic8,9, Olga Georgieva10, Stefano Di Gennaro11.
Abstract
The packaging materials industry has already recognized the importance of Total Productive Maintenance as a system of proactive techniques for improving equipment reliability. Bearing faults, which often occur gradually, represent one of the foremost causes of failures in the industry. Therefore, detection of their faults in an early stage is quite important to assure reliable and efficient operation. We present a new automated technique for early fault detection and diagnosis in rolling-element bearings based on vibration signal analysis. Following the wavelet decomposition of vibration signals into a few sub-bands of interest, the standard deviation of obtained wavelet coefficients is extracted as a representative feature. Then, the feature space dimension is optimally reduced to two using scatter matrices. In the reduced two-dimensional feature space the fault detection and diagnosis is carried out by quadratic classifiers. Accuracy of the technique has been tested on four classes of the recorded vibrations signals, i.e., normal, with the fault of inner race, outer race, and ball operation. The overall accuracy of 98.9% has been achieved. The new technique can be used to support maintenance decision-making processes and, thus, to increase reliability and efficiency in the industry by preventing unexpected faulty operation of bearings.Entities:
Keywords: bearings; fault diagnosis; reliability; statistical pattern recognition; total productive maintenance; wavelet transform
Year: 2016 PMID: 26938541 PMCID: PMC4813891 DOI: 10.3390/s16030316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Roller (a); bearing (b); and electric motor (c).
Figure 2Scheme of a laminator containing around 50 rollers (courtesy of Tetra Pak).
Figure 3Predictive maintenance Potential to Functional Failure (P-F) curve.
Figure 4Online vibration monitoring system (courtesy of SKF).
Figure 5Flowchart of the new technique for early FDD.
Figure 6Experimental system.
Figure 7Segments of the vibration signals collected from four different conditions of the ball bearing (left) and their frequency spectra (right).
Figure 8Sinusoid and two wavelets with different width.
Figure 9Dimension reduction in the feature space.
Standard deviations of the wavelet coefficients in six sub-bands of interest.
| Feature | Sub-Band | Normal | Ball Fault | Inner Race Fault | Outer Race Fault | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.705 | 0.585 | 0.795 | 0.383 | 0.728 | 0.467 | 0.473 | 0.484 | ||
| 1.694 | 0.193 | 0.545 | 0.093 | 0.431 | 0.126 | 0.247 | 0.116 | ||
| 1.288 | 0.106 | 0.636 | 0.092 | 0.750 | 0.058 | 0.302 | 0.063 | ||
| 1.847 | 0.199 | 0.525 | 0.087 | 0.919 | 0.044 | 0.243 | 0.056 | ||
| 0.800 | 0.033 | 1.239 | 0.052 | 1.267 | 0.057 | 1.255 | 0.097 | ||
| 0.220 | 0.025 | 1.041 | 0.035 | 0.951 | 0.037 | 1.083 | 0.055 | ||
Figure 10Standard deviation of the wavelet coefficients in the sub-band .
Figure 11Dimension reduction and classification for the fault detection, segments of the design set.
Figure 12Dimension reduction and classification for the fault diagnosis, segments of the design set.
Confusion matrix, segments of the design set.
| Fault Type (Input/Output) | Ball Fault | Inner Race Fault | Outer Race Fault |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball fault | 128 | 1 | 2 |
| Inner race fault | 0 | 127 | 0 |
| Outer race fault | 0 | 0 | 126 |
Statistical performances, segments of the design set.
| Fault Type | Statistical Performances (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
| Ball fault | 100.0 | 98.4 | 99.2 |
| Inner race fault | 99.2 | 99.2 | |
| Outer race fault | 98.4 | 99.6 | |
Figure 13Dimension reduction and classification for the fault detection, segments of the testing set.
Figure 14Dimension reduction and classification for the fault diagnosis, segments of the testing set.
Confusion matrix, segments of the testing set.
| Fault Type (Input/Output) | Ball Fault | Inner Race Fault | Outer Race Fault |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball fault | 128 | 1 | 3 |
| Inner race fault | 0 | 127 | 0 |
| Outer race fault | 0 | 0 | 125 |
Statistical performances, segments of the testing set.
| Fault Type | Statistical Performances (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
| Ball fault | 100.0 | 98.4 | 98.9 |
| Inner race fault | 99.2 | 98.8 | |
| Outer race fault | 96.6 | 99.6 | |
Comparison between a number of other techniques. Support vector regressive (SVR), local characteristic-scale decomposition (LCD), support vector machine (SVM), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), higher order statistics analysis (HOSA), principal components analysis (PCA), artificial neural networks (ANN), improved ant colony optimization (IACO), radial basis function (RBF), intrinsic mode functions (IMFs), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), inter-cluster distance (ICD), Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), window marginal spectrum clustering (WMSC), improved particles warm optimization (IPSO), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), symbolic aggregate approximation (SAX), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), hierarchical transition matrix model (HTMM).
| Reference | Feature Extraction | Classification | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Wavelet packets | C1: SVR | C1: 100.00 |
| [ | LCD + fuzzy entropy | ANFIS | 100.00 |
| [ | HOSA + PCA | “one-against all” SVM | 96.98 |
| [ | Time–frequency domain | ANN | 93.00 |
| [ | Time domain | IACO-SVM | 97.50 |
| [ | Time- and frequency-domains | SVM | 98.70 |
| [ | Time- and frequency-domains | C1: SVM with RBF kernel | C1: 91.25 |
| [ | IMFs decomposed by EEMD | SVM with parameter optimized by ICD | 97.91 |
| [ | HHT and WMSC | SVM | 100.00 |
| [ | IMFs decomposed by EMD | IPSO-LSSVM | 97.50 |
| [ | SAX and DWT | HTMM | 99.90 |