| Literature DB >> 26938452 |
Gunnel Helling1, Staffan Wahlin2, Marie Smedberg1, Linn Pettersson1, Inga Tjäder1, Åke Norberg1, Olav Rooyackers1, Jan Wernerman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Higher than normal plasma glutamine concentration at admission to an intensive care unit is associated with an unfavorable outcome. Very high plasma glutamine levels are sometimes seen in both acute and chronic liver failure. We aimed to systematically explore the relation between different types of liver failure and plasma glutamine concentrations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26938452 PMCID: PMC4777432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of four groups of patients with liver failure studied for plasma glutamine concentration.
| chronic | acute-on-chronic | acute fulminant | post-hepatectomy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 40) | (n = 20) | (n = 20) | (n = 20) | |
| gender (male/female) | 30/10 | 11/9 | 8/12 | 10/10 |
| age (years) | 57.5 (42–75) | 60 (25–75) | 48 (18–77) | 67.5 (51–80) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.5 (20–51) | 26 (22–40) | 24 (20–38) | 27 (23–40) |
| Child-Pugh score | 8 (5–12) | 12 (9–14) | 10.5 (8–13) | 8 (6–10) |
| MELD score | 14(6–25) | 26 (14–40) | 35.5 (10–43) | 16 (6–32) |
| SOFA score | NA | 14 (6–19) | 7.5 (2–21) | 4.5 (1–12) |
| 12-month mortality (%) | 47.5 | 85 | 15 | 55 |
| 12-month LTx (%) | 20 | 25 | 25 | NA |
| 12-month dead and/or LTx (%) | 67.5 | 100 | 35 | 55 |
Values are given as medians and ranges when applicable. BMI–body mass index, MELD–model for end-stage liver disease, SOFA–sequential organ failure assessment, LTx–liver transplantation, NA–not applicable
In Group A, chronic liver failure (n = 40), plasma glutamine concentration was 777 (351–1,251) μmol/L, one patient was below and 8 patients were above the reference interval of 400–930 μmol/L.
Etiologies behind chronic liver failure in group A.
| alcohol | 10 |
| alcohol + HCV | 6 |
| alcohol + HCC | 1 |
| alcohol + HCV + HCC | 1 |
| alcohol + AIH | 1 |
| HCV | 6 |
| HCV + HCC | 2 |
| HCV + HIV | 1 |
| HCV + HBV | 1 |
| NASH | 3 |
| AIH | 3 |
| AIH + HCC | 1 |
| AIH + PBC | 1 |
| cryptogen | 2 |
| vascular malformation | 1 |
AIH–Autoimmune hepatitis, HBV–Hepatitis B, HCC–Hepatocellular cancer, HCV–Hepatitis C, HIV–Human immunodeficiency virus disease, NASH–Non-alcohol steato-hepatitis, PBC–Primary biliary cirrhosis.
Fig 1Plasma glutamine concentration in relation to the Child-Pugh score as a reflection of the degree of liver failure.
In panel A chronic liver failure (n = 40), in panel B acute-on-chronic liver insufficiency (n = 20), in panel C acute fulminant liver failure (n = 20), and in panel D on the second postoperative day following major liver resection (n = 20). Open round symbols denote alive and filled round symbols denote dead 48 months after sampling. A thick sign on symbols in panel D denotes mortality in the acute phase. Squared inclusion denotes liver transplanted. The hatched area corresponds to the reference interval for plasma glutamine concentration. The rs-values for Spearman’s rank correlations together with the P-values for statistical significance are included in all four panels. Observe the different scales of the y-axes.
Fig 2Plasma glutamine concentration in relation to the MELD score as a reflection of the degree of liver failure.
In panel A chronic liver failure (n = 40), in panel B acute-on-chronic liver failure (n = 20), in panel C acute fulminant liver failure (n = 20), and in panel D on the second postoperative day following major liver resection (n = 20). Open round symbols denote alive and filled round symbols denote dead 48 months after sampling. Squared inclusion denotes liver transplanted. A thick sign on symbols in panel D denotes mortality in the acute phase. The hatched area corresponds to the reference interval for plasma glutamine concentration. The rs-values for Spearman’s rank correlations together with the P-values for statistical significance are included in all four panels. Observe the different scales of the y-axes.
Fig 3Longitudinal plasma glutamine concentration during hospital stay (or until acute liver transplantation in panel C) in panel B acute-on-chronic liver failure (n = 20), in panel C acute fulminant liver failure (n = 20), and in panel D following major liver resection (n = 20). Bold lines denote ongoing IV glutamine supplementation whilst staying in the ICU. Group A, chronic liver failure, was not followed longitudinally. Observe the different scales of the y-axes. In Group B, acute on chronic liver failure (n = 20), the decompensation etiologies or reasons for ICU admission were: gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8), severe sepsis/septic shock (n = 5), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 3), hepatorenal syndrome (n = 2), and encephalopathy West-Haven grade 4 (n = 2). Plasma glutamine concentration at ICU admission was 968 (115–4,184) μmol/L. Three patients were below and 11 patients were above the reference interval of 400–930 μmol/L. In Group C, acute fulminant liver failure (n = 20), the etiologies of liver failure were paracetamol intoxication (n = 9), ischemia (n = 4), acute viral hepatitis (n = 2), mushroom poisoning (n = 1), Wilson’s disease (n = 1), and unknown (n = 3). Plasma glutamine concentration at hospital admission was 1,116 (411–5,744) μmol/L. No patient was below and 11 patients were above the reference interval of 400–930 μmol/L. In Group D, patients undergoing liver resection (n = 20), the indications for liver resection were: metastatic colorectal cancer (n = 14), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5) and hepatocellular cancer (n = 1). Liver resection was 50–80%, and median peroperative bleeding was 1,800 (400–20,500) mL. Four patients were admitted to the ICU during the postoperative course. Plasma glutamine concentration at transfer from recovery room to high dependency unit on day 1–2 after surgery was 717 (365–2,468) μmol/L. One patient was below and four patients were above the reference interval of 400–930 μmol/L.
Fig 4Plasma glutamine concentration dichotomized above or below 930 μmol/L, the upper limit of the reference range, for the total group of patients with liver failure (n = 100).
The high out-of-normal–range values were then related to symptoms of liver failure as reflected by the Child-Pugh and MELD scores by receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC curves).