Literature DB >> 26938036

Redefining the Criteria for Grading Varicoceles Based on Reflux Times: A Clinicoradiological Correlation.

Vikram Patil1, S M Chandrashekar Shetty, Sudha Kiran Das.   

Abstract

The aims of the study were to redefine the criteria used to grade varicoceles, based on reflux times that correlate with Dubin and Amelar clinical grading by overcoming the limitations of clinical grading and to include the less known entity of intratesticular varicoceles in the grading. Prospective correlative study was undertaken at JSS Hospital, Mysore, India during the period from July 2010 to October 2014. All patients with clinical suspicion of varicocele were clinically graded by Dubin and Amelar grading system and were later subjected to duplex ultrasound examination. The duration of the reflux obtained during the Valsalva maneuver was measured in milliseconds. Patients with intratesticular varicocele were noted and they were subgraded. One hundred patients were examined as per the methodology.The mean reflux times obtained as per the clinically graded varicoceles were as follows: subclinical varicocele, 835 ms; grade 1 varicocele, 1907 ms; grade 2 varicocele, 3108 ms; and grade 3 varicocele, 4508 ms.Based on the results obtained, we propose a modified radiological grading of the varicocele that is based on reflux times at Valsalva maneuver for each clinical grade. The presence of an intratesticular varicocele with any of the above grades is to be suffixed with "I."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26938036     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for detection, classification, and grading.

Authors:  Simon Freeman; Michele Bertolotto; Jonathan Richenberg; Jane Belfield; Vikram Dogra; Dean Y Huang; Francesco Lotti; Karolina Markiet; Olivera Nikolic; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Parvati Ramchandani; Laurence Rocher; Mustafa Secil; Paul S Sidhu; Katarzyna Skrobisz; Michal Studniarek; Athina Tsili; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Pietro Pavlica; Lorenzo E Derchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele.

Authors:  Tomasz Lorenc; Leszek Krupniewski; Piotr Palczewski; Marek Gołębiowski
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 3.  Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: systematic literature review and rationale of the ESUR-SPIWG Guidelines and Recommendations.

Authors:  Michele Bertolotto; Simon Freeman; Jonathan Richenberg; Jane Belfield; Vikram Dogra; Dean Y Huang; Francesco Lotti; Karolina Markiet; Olivera Nikolic; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Parvati Ramchandani; Laurence Rocher; Mustafa Secil; Paul S Sidhu; Katarzyna Skrobisz; Michal Studniarek; Athina Tsili; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Pietro Pavlica; Lorenzo E Derchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 4.  Varicocoele. Classification and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michele Bertolotto; Vito Cantisani; Francesco Maria Drudi; Francesco Lotti
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.842

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.