Literature DB >> 26937771

Physical Differences Between Forwards and Backs in American Collegiate Rugby Players.

Michael B La Monica1, David H Fukuda, Amelia A Miramonti, Kyle S Beyer, Mattan W Hoffman, Carleigh H Boone, Satoru Tanigawa, Ran Wang, David D Church, Jeffrey R Stout, Jay R Hoffman.   

Abstract

La Monica, MB, Fukuda, DH, Miramonti, AA, Beyer, KS, Hoffman, MW, Boone, CH, Tanigawa, S, Wang, R, Church, DD, Stout, JR, and Hoffman, JR. Physical differences between forwards and backs in American collegiate rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 30(9): 2382-2391, 2016-This study examined the anthropometric and physical performance differences between forwards and backs in a championship-level American male collegiate rugby team. Twenty-five male rugby athletes (mean ± SD; age 20.2 ± 1.6 years) were assessed. Athletes were grouped according to position as forwards (n = 13) and backs (n = 12) and were evaluated on the basis of anthropometrics (height, weight, percent body fat [BF%]), cross-sectional area (CSA), muscle thickness (MT), and pennation angle (PA) of the vastus lateralis (VL), maximal strength (1 repetition maximum [1RM] bench press and squat), vertical jump power, midthigh pull (peak force [PF] and peak rate of force development [PRFD]), maximal aerobic capacity (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak), agility (pro agility, T test), speed (40-m sprint), and a tethered sprint (peak velocity [PV], time to peak velocity, distance covered, and step rate and length). Comparisons between forwards and backs were analyzed using independent t-tests with Cohen's d effect size. Forwards were significantly different from backs for body weight (90.5 ± 12.4 vs. 73.7 ± 7.1 kg, p < 0.01; d = 1.60), BF% (12.6 ± 4.2 vs. 8.8 ± 2.1%, p ≤ 0.05; d = 1.10), VL CSA (38.3 ± 9.1 vs. 28.7 ± 4.7 cm, p < 0.01; d = 1.26), 1RM bench press (121.1 ± 30.3 vs. 89.5 ± 20.4 kg, p ≤ 0.05; d = 1.17), 1RM squat (164.6 ± 43.0 vs. 108.5 ± 31.5 kg, p < 0.01; d = 1.42), PF (2,244.6 ± 505.2 vs. 1,654.6 ± 338.8 N, p < 0.01; d = 1.32), PV (5.49 ± 0.25 vs. 5.14 ± 0.37 m·s, p ≤ 0.05; d = 1.04), and step length (1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 m, p ≤ 0.05; d = 0.80). V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak was significantly (p ≤ 0.05, d = -1.20) higher in backs (54.9 ± 3.9 ml·kg·min) than in forwards (49.4 ± 4.4 ml·kg·min). No differences in agility performance were found between position groups. The results of this study provide descriptive information on anthropometric and performance measures on American male collegiate championship-level rugby players offering potential standards for coaches to use when developing or recruiting players.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26937771     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF CRYOTHERAPY MODALITY APPLICATION OVER THE ANTERIOR THIGH ACROSS RUGBY UNION POSITIONS; A CROSSOVER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  Jill Alexander; Dr David Rhodes; Daniel Birdsall; Prof James Selfe
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04

2.  Can Positioning Systems Replace Timing Gates for Measuring Sprint Time in Ice Hockey?

Authors:  Daniel Link; Marcus Weber; Daniel Linke; Martin Lames
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Epidemiology of Shoulder Injuries in Schoolboy Rugby Union in Ireland.

Authors:  Therese M Leahy; Ian C Kenny; Mark J Campbell; Giles D Warrington; Roisin Cahalan; Andrew J Harrison; Mark Lyons; Liam G Glynn; Kieran O'Sullivan; Helen Purtill; Thomas M Comyns
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-31

4.  Elite Rugby Players have Unique Morphological Characteristics of the Hamstrings and Quadriceps Femoris Muscles According to their Playing Positions.

Authors:  Raki Kawama; Masamichi Okudaira; Seigo Shibata; Tatsuya Shimasaki; Hirohiko Maemura; Satoru Tanigawa
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

5.  Anthropometric, physiological characteristics and rugby-specific game skills discriminating Zimbabwean under-16 male adolescent rugby players by level of competition.

Authors:  Matthew Chiwaridzo; Gillian D Ferguson; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-08-21

6.  Sub-elite sprinters and rugby players possess different morphological characteristics of the individual hamstrings and quadriceps muscles.

Authors:  Raki Kawama; Masamichi Okudaira; Tatsuya Shimasaki; Hirohiko Maemura; Satoru Tanigawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ramadan Nutritional Strategy: Professional Soccer Player Case Study.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez; Laura Miralles-Amorós; Manuel Vicente-Martínez; Nuria Asencio-Mas; Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda; María Martínez-Olcina
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.