| Literature DB >> 26937381 |
Scott S Hall1, Robert F Dougherty2, Allan L Reiss3.
Abstract
Previous studies attempting to quantify white matter (WM) microstructure in individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) have produced inconsistent findings, most likely due to the various control groups employed, differing analysis methods, and failure to examine for potential motion artifact. In addition, analyses have heretofore lacked sufficient specificity to provide regional information. In this study, we used Automated Fiber-tract Quantification (AFQ) to identify specific regions of aberrant WM microstructure along WM tracts in patients with FXS that differed from controls who were matched on age, IQ and degree of autistic symptoms. Participants were 20 patients with FXS, aged 10 to 23 years, and 20 matched controls. Using Automated Fiber-tract Quantification (AFQ), we created Tract Profiles of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity along 18 major WM fascicles. We found that fractional anisotropy was significantly increased in the left and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), right uncinate fasciculus, and left cingulum hippocampus in individuals with FXS compared to controls. Conversely, mean diffusivity was significantly decreased in the right ILF in patients with FXS compared to controls. Age was significantly negatively associated with MD values across both groups in 11 tracts. Taken together, these findings indicate that FXS results in abnormal WM microstructure in specific regions of the ILF and uncinate fasciculus, most likely caused by inefficient synaptic pruning as a result of decreased or absent Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP). Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.Entities:
Keywords: Autism; Diffusion tensor imaging; FMR1 gene; Fragile X syndrome; White matter microstructure
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26937381 PMCID: PMC4753809 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.01.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographic information.
| Characteristic | FXS | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 20 | 20 | |
| Female | 12 (60.0) | 7 (35.0) | |
| Medications (any) | 9 (45.0) | 6 (30.0) | |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Age, year | 16.63 (4.69) | 16.57 (3.90) | |
| FSIQ | 67.30 (10.54) | 64.85 (11.03) | |
| Autistic symptoms | 8.90 (5.72) | 11.15 (6.63) | |
Abbreviations: FXS, fragile X syndrome; FSIQ, full scale IQ; VIQ, verbal IQ; PIQ, Performance IQ.
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (Wechsler, 1999).
Social Communication Questionnaire (Rutter et al., 2003).
Group differences in tract diffusion properties.
| Tract name | Fractional anisotropy (FA) | Mean diffusivity (MD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left ILF | 2.13 | .153 | ||
| Right ILF | ||||
| Left SLF | 3.64 | .065 | .49 | .488 |
| Right SLF | .74 | .395 | .12 | .731 |
| Left IFOF | .11 | .738 | .14 | .707 |
| Right IFOF | .24 | .628 | .11 | .744 |
| Left cingulum hippocampus | .26 | .617 | ||
| Right cingulum hippocampus | .44 | .510 | .70 | .410 |
| Left thalamic radiation | .01 | .924 | .74 | .394 |
| Right thalamic radiation | .09 | .767 | .43 | .516 |
| Left cingulum cingulate | .24 | .628 | .00 | .981 |
| Right cingulum cingulate | .54 | .469 | .04 | .839 |
| Callosum forceps major | .01 | .916 | 1.87 | .180 |
| Callosum forceps minor | 1.64 | .208 | 1.22 | .277 |
| Left uncinate | 1.08 | .305 | .59 | .449 |
| Right uncinate | .05 | .818 | ||
| Left arcuate | .09 | .765 | .18 | .671 |
| Right arcuate | .05 | .833 | .20 | .655 |
Bold indicates p < .05.
Fig. 1Group differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) in the Left ILF, right ILF, uncinate fasciculus and cingulate hippocampus. The color bar indicates T-statistic values from Bonferroni-corrected analyses of covariance conducted at each location along the tract length. Each Tract Profile shows FA values calculated at each of 100 equidistant points (x-axis) along the fascicle for individuals with FXS (represented in red), and matched controls (represented in black). Each plot shows the mean Tract Profile +/− 1 standard error of the mean for each group. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Group differences in mean diffusivity (MD) in the right ILF. The color bar indicates T-statistic values from Bonferroni-corrected analyses of covariance conducted at each location along the tract length. The Tract Profile shows MD values calculated at each of 100 equidistant points (x-axis) along the fascicle for individuals with FXS (represented in red), and matched controls (represented in black). Each plot shows the mean Tract Profile +/− 1 standard error of the mean for each group. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Correlations obtained between diffusion parameters and subject motion (translation and rotation) along the length of the tracts where group differences were found.