AIM: To describe the disease and psychosocial outcomes of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) transition cohort and their perspectives. METHODS: Patients with IBD, aged > 18 years, who had moved from paediatric to adult care within 10 years were identified through IBD databases at three tertiary hospitals. Participants were surveyed regarding demographic and disease specific data and their perspectives on the transition process. Survey response data were compared to contemporaneously recorded information in paediatric service case notes. Data were compared to a similar age cohort who had never received paediatric IBD care and therefore who had not undergone a transition process. RESULTS: There were 81 returned surveys from 46 transition and 35 non-transition patients. No statistically significant differences were found in disease burden, disease outcomes or adult roles and responsibilities between cohorts. Despite a high prevalence of mood disturbance (35%), there was a very low usage (5%) of psychological services in both cohorts. In the transition cohort, knowledge of their transition plan was reported by only 25/46 patients and the majority (54%) felt they were not strongly prepared. A high rate (78%) of discussion about work/study plans was recorded prior to transition, but a near complete absence of discussion regarding sex (8%), and other adult issues was recorded. Both cohorts agreed that their preferred method of future transition practices (of the options offered) was a shared clinic appointment with all key stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Transition did not appear to adversely affect disease or psychosocial outcomes. Current transition care processes could be optimised, with better psychosocial preparation and agreed transition plans.
AIM: To describe the disease and psychosocial outcomes of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) transition cohort and their perspectives. METHODS:Patients with IBD, aged > 18 years, who had moved from paediatric to adult care within 10 years were identified through IBD databases at three tertiary hospitals. Participants were surveyed regarding demographic and disease specific data and their perspectives on the transition process. Survey response data were compared to contemporaneously recorded information in paediatric service case notes. Data were compared to a similar age cohort who had never received paediatric IBD care and therefore who had not undergone a transition process. RESULTS: There were 81 returned surveys from 46 transition and 35 non-transition patients. No statistically significant differences were found in disease burden, disease outcomes or adult roles and responsibilities between cohorts. Despite a high prevalence of mood disturbance (35%), there was a very low usage (5%) of psychological services in both cohorts. In the transition cohort, knowledge of their transition plan was reported by only 25/46 patients and the majority (54%) felt they were not strongly prepared. A high rate (78%) of discussion about work/study plans was recorded prior to transition, but a near complete absence of discussion regarding sex (8%), and other adult issues was recorded. Both cohorts agreed that their preferred method of future transition practices (of the options offered) was a shared clinic appointment with all key stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Transition did not appear to adversely affect disease or psychosocial outcomes. Current transition care processes could be optimised, with better psychosocial preparation and agreed transition plans.
Authors: Robert Baldassano; George Ferry; Anne Griffiths; David Mack; James Markowitz; Harland Winter Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: S Kipps; T Bahu; K Ong; F M Ackland; R S Brown; C T Fox; N K Griffin; A H Knight; N P Mann; H A W Neil; H Simpson; J A Edge; D B Dunger Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Swathi Eluri; Wendy M Book; Ellyn Kodroff; Mary Jo Strobel; Jessica H Gebhart; Patricia D Jones; Paul Menard-Katcher; Maria E Ferris; Evan S Dellon Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Nancy Fu; Natasha Bollegala; Kevan Jacobson; Karen I Kroeker; Karen Frost; Waqqas Afif; Wael El-Matary; Sharyle A Fowler; Anne M Griffiths; Hien Q Huynh; Prévost Jantchou; Ahmer Karimuddin; Geoffrey C Nguyen; Anthony R Otley; Christina Pears; Cynthia H Seow; Alene Toulany; Claudia Tersigni; Joanne Tignanelli; John K Marshall; Monica Boctor; Tawnya Hansen; Chandni Pattni; Andrew Wong; Eric I Benchimol Journal: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Date: 2022-03-26
Authors: Gertrude van den Brink; Martha A C van Gaalen; Marieke Zijlstra; Lissy de Ridder; Christine J van der Woude; Johanna C Escher Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Gertrude van den Brink; Martha A C van Gaalen; Lissy de Ridder; C Janneke van der Woude; Johanna C Escher Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Jane N T Sattoe; Mariëlle A C Peeters; Jannie Haitsma; AnneLoes van Staa; Victorien M Wolters; Johanna C Escher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 2.692