Literature DB >> 26936637

Does the physiology of chondrichthyan fishes constrain their distribution in the deep sea?

Jason R Treberg1, Ben Speers-Roesch2.   

Abstract

The deep sea is the largest ecosystem on Earth but organisms living there must contend with high pressure, low temperature, darkness and scarce food. Chondrichthyan fishes (sharks and their relatives) are important consumers in most marine ecosystems but are uncommon deeper than 3000 m and exceedingly rare, or quite possibly absent, from the vast abyss (depths >4000 m). By contrast, teleost (bony) fishes are commonly found to depths of ∼ 8400 m. Why chondrichthyans are scarce at abyssal depths is a major biogeographical puzzle. Here, after outlining the depth-related physiological trends among chondrichthyans, we discuss several existing and new hypotheses that implicate unique physiological and biochemical characteristics of chondrichthyans as potential constraints on their depth distribution. We highlight three major, and not mutually exclusive, working hypotheses: (1) the urea-based osmoregulatory strategy of chondrichthyans might conflict with the interactive effects of low temperature and high pressure on protein and membrane function at great depth; (2) the reliance on lipid accumulation for buoyancy in chondrichthyans has a unique energetic cost, which might increasingly limit growth and reproductive output as food availability decreases with depth; (3) their osmoregulatory strategy may make chondrichthyans unusually nitrogen limited, a potential liability in the food-poor abyss. These hypotheses acting in concert could help to explain the scarcity of chondrichthyans at great depths: the mechanisms of the first hypothesis may place an absolute, pressure-related depth limit on physiological function, while the mechanisms of the second and third hypotheses may limit depth distribution by constraining performance in the oligotrophic abyss, in ways that preclude the establishment of viable populations or lead to competitive exclusion by teleosts.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeography; Buoyancy; Chimaera; Elasmobranch; Energetics; Geographic range limit; Hydrostatic pressure; Metabolism; Nitrogen limitation; Osmoregulation; Ray; Shark; Skate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936637     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.128108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Physical trade-offs shape the evolution of buoyancy control in sharks.

Authors:  Adrian C Gleiss; Jean Potvin; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  An investigation of bubble resonance and its implications for sound production by deep-water fishes.

Authors:  Mark W Sprague; Michael L Fine; Timothy M Cameron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Sixth sense in the deep-sea: the electrosensory system in ghost shark Chimaera monstrosa.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bottaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Talking to the dead: using Post-mortem data in the assessment of stress in tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) (Péron and Lesueur, 1822).

Authors:  Natascha Wosnick; Hugo Bornatowski; Carolina Ferraz; André Afonso; Bianca Sousa Rangel; Fábio Hissa Vieira Hazin; Carolina Arruda Freire
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.794

5.  Metabolic Tolerance to Atmospheric Pressure of Two Freshwater Endemic Amphipods Mostly Inhabiting the Deep-Water Zone of the Ancient Lake Baikal.

Authors:  Ekaterina Madyarova; Yulia Shirokova; Anton Gurkov; Polina Drozdova; Boris Baduev; Yulia Lubyaga; Zhanna Shatilina; Maria Vishnevskaya; Maxim Timofeyev
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Bathyal and abyssal demersal bait-attending fauna of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Thomas D Linley; Jessica Craig; Alan J Jamieson; Imants G Priede
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.