Literature DB >> 26936551

Cues for auditory stream segregation of birdsong in budgerigars and zebra finches: Effects of location, timing, amplitude, and frequency.

Micheal L Dent1, Amanda K Martin1, Mary M Flaherty1, Erikson G Neilans1.   

Abstract

Deciphering the auditory scene is a problem faced by many organisms. However, when faced with numerous overlapping sounds from multiple locations, listeners are still able to attribute the individual sound objects to their individual sound-producing sources. Here, the characteristics of sounds important for integrating versus segregating in birds were determined. Budgerigars and zebra finches were trained using operant conditioning procedures on an identification task to peck one key when they heard a whole zebra finch song and to peck another when they heard a zebra finch song missing a middle syllable. Once the birds were trained to a criterion performance level on those stimuli, probe trials were introduced on a small proportion of trials. The probe songs contained modifications of the incomplete training song's missing syllable. When the bird responded as if the probe was a whole song, it suggests they streamed together the altered syllable and the rest of the song. When the bird responded as if the probe was a non-whole song, it suggests they segregated the altered probe from the rest of the song. Results show that some features, such as location and intensity, are more important for segregating than other features, such as timing and frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936551     DOI: 10.1121/1.4941322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

Review 1.  Animal models for auditory streaming.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Call divergence in three sympatric Rattus species.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Qian-Qian Su; Jiao Qin; Quan-Sheng Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) do not hear infrasound: the audiogram from 8 Hz to 10 kHz.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Selective auditory grouping by zebra finches: testing the iambic-trochaic law.

Authors:  Michelle Spierings; Jeroen Hubert; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Attention capture in birds performing an auditory streaming task.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Simons; Mark K Hinders
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.