Literature DB >> 26935852

Long-term results of stenting versus coronary artery bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease-A single-center experience.

Tse-Min Lu1, Wan-Liang Lee2, Pai-Feng Hsu1, Ting-Chao Lin3, Shih-Hsien Sung1, Kang-Ling Wang1, Shao-Sung Huang1, Wan-Leong Chan1, Chun-Che Shih3, Shing-Jong Lin1, Chiao-Po Hsu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as an alternative treatment to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease, but the results of both treatments are less clear in real-world practice. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of unprotected LM disease treated with CABG or PCI with stenting in high-risk population from a single center.
METHODS: We collected 478 consecutive patients with unprotected LM disease (PCI/CABG: 208/270; mean age: 70 ± 11 years; 85% male), and 252 patients were considered to be at high risk (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥6). The median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range: 2.7-6.5 years).
RESULTS: All-cause death (PCI/CABG: 27.4%/31.5%; p = 0.36) and all-cause death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke (PCI/CABG: 30.8%/35.9%; p = 0.49) were comparable between the two groups, whereas the repeat revascularization rate was significantly higher in the PCI group (PCI/CABG: 22.6%/11.0%; p < 0.01). These results remained similar after adjustment with the propensity score. Notably, CABG tended to be associated with higher periprocedural mortality (adjusted p = 0.08) and long-term stroke (adjusted p = 0.05), while PCI was associated with higher long-term MI (adjusted p = 0.09). Analyses of the diabetic subgroup (PCI/CABG: 98/124) yielded similar results.
CONCLUSION: PCI was a comparable alternative to CABG for high-risk patients with unprotected LM disease in terms of long-term risks of all-cause death/MI/stroke, but with a significantly higher repeat revascularization rate.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary stent; left main coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935852     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  4 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in patients with STEMI and unprotected left main stem disease: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talal Almas; Ahson Afzal; Hameeda Fatima; Sadia Yaqoob; Furqan Ahmad Jarullah; Zaeem Ahmed Abbasi; Anoosh Farooqui; Duaa Jaffar; Atiya Batool; Shayan Ahmed; Neha Sara Azmat; Fatima Afzal; Sarah Zafar Khan; Kaneez Fatima
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Meta-analysis study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention/drug eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass surgery of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: Clinical outcomes during short-term versus long-term (> 1 year) follow-up.

Authors:  Waleed E Ali; Satyanarayana R Vaidya; Sylvester U Ejeh; Kingsley U Okoroafor
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Lin Zhang; Qing-Qing Zhu; Jing-Jing Yang; Yu-Han Chen; Yang Li; Su-Hui Zhu; Jun Xie; Lian Wang; Li-Na Kang; Biao Xu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients Disqualified from Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Wojciech Jan Skorupski; Marta Kałużna-Oleksy; Maciej Lesiak; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Włodzimierz Skorupski; Stefan Grajek; Przemysław Mitkowski; Małgorzata Pyda; Marek Grygier
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.