R Boak1, M Virgo-Milton1,2, A Hoare1, A de Silva3,4, L Gibbs1, L Gold5, M Gussy6, H Calache4,7, M Smith8, E Waters1. 1. Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program. Centre for Health Equity, The Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. GP Data and Business Modelling, Western Victoria Primary Health Network, Geelong, VIC, Australia. 3. Centre Applied Oral Health Research, Dental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, VIC, Australia. 4. Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Deakin Health Economics, Deakin Population Health SRC, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 6. Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 7. Clinical Leadership, Education and Research, Dental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, VIC, Australia. 8. Oral Health Services, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Examining the experiences of parents making food choices for infants is important because ultimately this influences what infants eat. Infancy is a critical period when food preferences and eating behaviour begin to develop, shaping dietary patterns, growth and health outcomes. There is limited evidence regarding what or why foods are chosen for infants. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences of mothers making food choices for their infant children. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 32 Australian mothers of infants aged four to 15 months from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds. An inductive thematic analysis through a process of constant comparison was conducted on transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Mothers described many ideas and circumstances which influenced food choices they made for infants. Themes were developed which encapsulate how the wider environment and individual circumstances combine to result in the food choices made for infants. Beliefs, values, norms and knowledge were a central influence on choices. Cost, quality and availabilities of various foods were also key factors. Related to this, and combined with inherent factors such as perishability and infant acceptability, fresh fruits and vegetables were often singled out as an easy or difficult choice. Influences of time, parents' capacities, social connections and different information sources were clearly apparent. Finally infants' own preferences and how parents helped infants with learning to eat were also key influences on food choices. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing foods for infants is a complex social practice. An ecological framework depicting the multiple influences on what people eat and sociological theory on food choice regarding the role of 'social structure' and 'human agency' are both applicable to the process of choosing foods for infants. Equity issues may be key regarding the degree to which mothers can choose particular foods for infants (e.g. choosing foods which promote health).
BACKGROUND: Examining the experiences of parents making food choices for infants is important because ultimately this influences what infants eat. Infancy is a critical period when food preferences and eating behaviour begin to develop, shaping dietary patterns, growth and health outcomes. There is limited evidence regarding what or why foods are chosen for infants. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences of mothers making food choices for their infantchildren. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 32 Australian mothers of infants aged four to 15 months from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds. An inductive thematic analysis through a process of constant comparison was conducted on transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Mothers described many ideas and circumstances which influenced food choices they made for infants. Themes were developed which encapsulate how the wider environment and individual circumstances combine to result in the food choices made for infants. Beliefs, values, norms and knowledge were a central influence on choices. Cost, quality and availabilities of various foods were also key factors. Related to this, and combined with inherent factors such as perishability and infant acceptability, fresh fruits and vegetables were often singled out as an easy or difficult choice. Influences of time, parents' capacities, social connections and different information sources were clearly apparent. Finally infants' own preferences and how parents helped infants with learning to eat were also key influences on food choices. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing foods for infants is a complex social practice. An ecological framework depicting the multiple influences on what people eat and sociological theory on food choice regarding the role of 'social structure' and 'human agency' are both applicable to the process of choosing foods for infants. Equity issues may be key regarding the degree to which mothers can choose particular foods for infants (e.g. choosing foods which promote health).
Authors: Diep H Ha; Loc G Do; Andrew John Spencer; William Murray Thomson; Rebecca K Golley; Andrew J Rugg-Gunn; Steven M Levy; Jane A Scott Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hanna Y Berhane; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Magnus Jirström; Yemane Berhane; Christopher Turner; Beatrix W Alsanius; Jill Trenholm Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Eleni Spyreli; Michelle C McKinley; Virginia Allen-Walker; Louise Tully; Jayne V Woodside; Colette Kelly; Moira Dean Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Femke W M Damen; Pieternel A Luning; Gert Jan Hofstede; Vincenzo Fogliano; Bea L P A Steenbekkers Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Jennifer Tartaglia; Michelle McIntosh; Jonine Jancey; Jane Scott; Andrea Begley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: S M C van der Veek; C de Graaf; J H M de Vries; G Jager; C M J L Vereijken; H Weenen; N van Winden; M S van Vliet; J M Schultink; V W T de Wild; S Janssen; J Mesman Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 2.125