Literature DB >> 26935314

Total Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Component Separation, Reinforcement, and Vertical Abdominoplasty in Patients with Complex Ventral Hernias.

Antonio Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros1, Héctor Avendaño-Peza2, Zeniff Gómez-Arcive2, Luis Alfonso Martin-Del-Campo2, Jose-Adolfo Navarro-Navarro2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Large complex ventral hernias act as tissue expanders for skin and subcutaneous fat. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of total abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation, posterior reinforcement, and vertical abdominoplasty in patients with large complex ventral hernias. Between 2010 and 2014, 58 patients underwent total abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation, intra-abdominal reinforcement, and vertical abdominoplasty. Between 2010 and 2012, patients underwent the conventional technique of component separation, while a perforator-preserving technique was performed during 2013 and 2014. Reinforcement material used was either synthetic mesh in clean cases or biologic mesh if contamination was present. All of the excessive skin and subcutaneous fat was removed in a vertical fashion. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney's U test or Fisher's exact test, as indicated. There were 27 moderately complex and 31 majorly complex hernias. Mean hernia size was 16 × 12 cm. The mean size of the removed skin island was 21 × 12 cm. Patients with contamination during the repair had longer in-hospital stays. Overall the local wound complication rate was 24 %, and was lower with the perforator-preserving technique compared to the conventional technique of component separation (11 vs. 48 %; OR 0.13, CI 0.03-0.5; p = 0.003). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was higher in the presence of contamination, and in patients with lower preoperative serum albumin levels. Mean total follow-up was 14 months with a 1-year recurrence-free survival of 96 %. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall reconstruction; Abdominoplasty; Ventral hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935314     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-016-0628-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  5 in total

1.  Systematic review of transversus abdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Wegdam; J M M Thoolen; S W Nienhuijs; N de Bouvy; T S de Vries Reilingh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation with posterior component separation and transversus abdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  J D Hodgkinson; C A Leo; Y Maeda; P Bassett; S M Oke; C J Vaizey; J Warusavitarne
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Management of skin and subcutaneous tissue in complex open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  I Khansa; J E Janis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Is simultaneous panniculectomy an ideal approach to repair a ventral hernia: a general surgeon's experience.

Authors:  K Slater; A A Ajjikuttira
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.920

5.  Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m2: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm.

Authors:  S J Baig; P Priya
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.739

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.