Literature DB >> 26935058

Highly and moderately aggressive mouse ovarian cancer cell lines exhibit differential gene expression.

Fengkun Du1, Yan Li1,2, Wensheng Zhang1, Shubha P Kale1, Harris McFerrin1, Ian Davenport1, Guangdi Wang3, Elena Skripnikova1, Xiao-Lin Li1, Nathan J Bowen4, Leticia B McDaniels1, Yuan-Xiang Meng5, Paula Polk6, Yong-Yu Liu7, Qian-Jin Zhang1.   

Abstract

Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer often experience disease recurrence after standard therapies, a critical factor in determining their five-year survival rate. Recent reports indicated that long-term or short-term survival is associated with varied gene expression of cancer cells. Thus, identification of novel prognostic biomarkers should be considered. Since the mouse genome is similar to the human genome, we explored potential prognostic biomarkers using two groups of mouse ovarian cancer cell lines (group 1: IG-10, IG-10pw, and IG-10pw/agar; group 2: IG-10 clones 2, 3, and 11) which display highly and moderately aggressive phenotypes in vivo. Mice injected with these cell lines have different survival time and rates, capacities of tumor, and ascites formations, reflecting different prognostic potentials. Using an Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array, a total of 181 genes were differentially expressed (P < 0.01) by at least twofold between two groups of the cell lines. Of the 181 genes, 109 and 72 genes were overexpressed in highly and moderately aggressive cell lines, respectively. Analysis of the 109 and 72 genes using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) tool revealed two cancer-related gene networks. One was associated with the highly aggressive cell lines and affiliated with MYC gene, and another was associated with the moderately aggressive cell lines and affiliated with the androgen receptor (AR). Finally, the gene enrichment analysis indicated that the overexpressed 89 genes (out of 109 genes) in highly aggressive cell lines had a function annotation in the David database. The cancer-relevant significant gene ontology (GO) terms included Cell cycle, DNA metabolic process, and Programmed cell death. None of the genes from a set of the 72 genes overexpressed in the moderately aggressive cell lines had a function annotation in the David database. Our results suggested that the overexpressed MYC and 109 gene set represented highly aggressive ovarian cancer potential biomarkers while overexpressed AR and 72 gene set represented moderately aggressive ovarian cancer potential biomarkers. Based on our knowledge, the current study is first time to report the potential biomarkers relevant to different aggressive ovarian cancer. These potential biomarkers provide important information for investigating human ovarian cancer prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Ovarian cancer; Prognostic biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935058      PMCID: PMC5292133          DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4518-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  45 in total

1.  Classical oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes: a comparative genomics perspective.

Authors:  O K Pickeral; J Z Li; I Barrow; M S Boguski; W Makałowski; J Zhang
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Identification and characterization of E2F7, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation.

Authors:  Alain de Bruin; Baidehi Maiti; Laszlo Jakoi; Cynthia Timmers; Robin Buerki; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Expression of factors involved in regulation of DNA mismatch repair- and apoptosis pathways in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Verena Materna; Pawel Surowiak; Ewa Markwitz; Marek Spaczynski; Malgorzata Drag-Zalesinska; Maciej Zabel; Hermann Lage
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Apart from stage and grade, tumor progesterone receptor content is a prognostic indicator.

Authors:  B J Slotman; J J Nauta; B R Rao
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Expression of epidermal growth factor and androgen receptors in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J V Ilekis; J P Connor; G S Prins; K Ferrer; C Niederberger; B Scoccia
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  In vivo survivors of transformed mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells display diverse phenotypes for gene expression and tumorigenicity.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Li; Dong-Qing Zhang; David Wang; David S Knight; Lija Yin; Jianxiong Bao; Yong-Yu Liu; Jonathan Glass; J Michael Mathis; Qian-Jin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2008-12-03

Review 8.  Expression profiles of genes involved in poor prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Shozo Yoshida; Naoto Furukawa; Shoji Haruta; Yasuhito Tanase; Seiji Kanayama; Taketoshi Noguchi; Mariko Sakata; Yoshihiko Yamada; Hidekazu Oi; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  G2E3 is a dual function ubiquitin ligase required for early embryonic development.

Authors:  William S Brooks; E Scott Helton; Sami Banerjee; Melanie Venable; Larry Johnson; Trenton R Schoeb; Robert A Kesterson; David F Crawford
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Epithelial ovarian cancer: the role of cell cycle genes in the different histotypes.

Authors:  Giuseppina D'Andrilli; Antonio Giordano; Alessandro Bovicelli
Journal:  Open Clin Cancer J       Date:  2008-02-06
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of the androgen receptor in ovarian cancer carcinogenesis and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhu; Xuejie Zhu; Lihong Zheng; Xiaoli Hu; LuZhe Sun; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  Fallopian Tube-Derived Tumor Cells Induce Testosterone Secretion from the Ovary, Increasing Epithelial Proliferation and Invasion.

Authors:  Jose A Colina; Katherine E Zink; Kanella Eliadis; Reza Salehi; Emma S Gargus; Sarah R Wagner; Kristine J Moss; Seth Baligod; Kailiang Li; Brenna J Kirkpatrick; Teresa K Woodruff; Benjamin K Tsang; Laura M Sanchez; Joanna E Burdette
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Evaluation of Oncogene NUP37 as a Potential Novel Biomarker in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kangdi Li; Ting Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Molecular Regulation of Androgen Receptors in Major Female Reproductive System Cancers.

Authors:  Sujun Wu; Kun Yu; Zhengxing Lian; Shoulong Deng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  N-Acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) is dysregulated in colorectal cancer patients and its inhibition reduces experimental cancer growth.

Authors:  Barbara Romano; Ester Pagano; Fabio A Iannotti; Fabiana Piscitelli; Vincenzo Brancaleone; Giuseppe Lucariello; Maria Francesca Nanì; Ferdinando Fiorino; Rosa Sparaco; Giovanna Vanacore; Federica Di Tella; Donatella Cicia; Ruggero Lionetti; Alexandros Makriyannis; Michael Malamas; Marcello De Luca; Giovanni Aprea; Maria D'Armiento; Raffaele Capasso; Bernardo Sbarro; Tommaso Venneri; Vincenzo Di Marzo; Francesca Borrelli; Angelo A Izzo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 9.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.