Literature DB >> 26934827

Solid Cancers in the Premature and the Newborn: Report of Three National Referral Centers.

Anna Raciborska1, Katarzyna Bilska2, Jadwiga Węcławek-Tompol3, Marek Ussowicz3, Monika Pogorzała4, Joanna Janowska5, Magdalena Rychłowska-Pruszyńska2, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo6, Ewa Helwich5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in multidisciplinary care for pediatric cancer have resulted in significant improvement in cure rates over the last decades; however, these advances have not been uniform across all age groups. Cancer is an important cause of perinatal mortality, yet the full spectrum of malignant neoplasms in newborns is not well defined.
METHODS: The authors have reviewed the clinical features and outcomes of 37 newborns with congenital malignant tumors treated at three referral centers in North, Central, and South Poland between 1980 and 2014. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using long-rank test and Cox models.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were diagnosed prenatally. The most common diagnoses were neuroblastoma (48.7%), followed by malignant germ-cell tumor (16.2%), and Wilms' tumor (8.1%). Neuroblastoma was the most common malignancy among full-term infants, and malignant sacrococcygeal teratoma was the most common malignancy in premature infants. Thirty patients (81%) are alive with a median follow-up of 4.8 years from diagnosis. Patients with Wilms' tumor and malignant germ-cell tumors had the best outcomes (5-year OS 100% for both), whereas the worst prognosis was observed for sarcoma patients (5-year OS 72.92%). Premature infants had better outcome than full-term infants (5-year OS 92.8% vs. 72.58%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Although rare, neonatal cancers can present with an aggressive clinical behavior, but they have a generally good outcome. Early diagnosis and management by expert multidisciplinary teams that integrate perinatal medicine experts with pediatric and surgical oncologists are critical. Centralized care with clear referral pathways that facilitate early initiation of specialized treatment should be prioritized.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neonate; perinatal cancer; premature; survival; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26934827     DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Neonatol        ISSN: 1875-9572            Impact factor:   2.083


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Tumor Profile in Primary Immune Deficiencies Challenges the Cancer Immune Surveillance Concept.

Authors:  Daniel Satgé
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Adrenal hemorrhage in newborn: how, when and why- from case report to literature review.

Authors:  M S Toti; P Ghirri; A Bartoli; C Caputo; E Laudani; F Masoni; L Mele; R Bernardini
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 3.  Primary Immunodeficiency and Cancer Predisposition Revisited: Embedding Two Closely Related Concepts Into an Integrative Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Oskar A Haas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Clinical Presentation and Surgical Management of Neonatal Tumors: Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Shailesh Solanki; Prema Menon; Ram Samujh; Kirti Gupta; K L N Rao
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.