Peng-Fei Liu1, Da-Hui Zhao1, Yan Qi2, Jian-Guo Wang1, Ming Zhao1, Kun Xiao1, Li-Xin Xie1. 1. Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. 2. Department of Nephrology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in lung cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 172 healthy control subjects and 164 patients with histopathologically confirmed lung cancer were enrolled in this study. The FeNO measurements and pulmonary function tests were conducted in the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The recorded data included FeNO, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), the forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1 /FVC, the FEV1 (% predicted), the demographic characteristics, the presence of complications and the smoking status. RESULTS: The patients with lung cancer had a significantly higher level of eNO than the healthy control subjects (33.85 ± 15.63 ppb, n = 163; 16.83 ± 4.17 ppb, n = 172; P < 0.01). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for eNO predicting airway inflammation in lung cancer subjects and healthy control subjects was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.904-0.961). In the lung cancer group, the eNO levels in the squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung cancer and lung carcinoid tumor groups were significantly different (P < 0.01). Lung cancer patients with a predicted FEV1 % value <80% had a higher level of eNO than the patients with a predicted FEV1 % value ≥80%. CONCLUSIONS: The eNO levels in patients with lung cancer were higher than the normal level, especially in the patients with squamous cell carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. The differences in eNO among the lung cancer subtypes were statistically significant. Measuring eNO will be helpful in diagnosing airway inflammation in lung cancer and in the classification of lung cancer.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in lung cancerpatients. METHODS: A total of 172 healthy control subjects and 164 patients with histopathologically confirmed lung cancer were enrolled in this study. The FeNO measurements and pulmonary function tests were conducted in the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The recorded data included FeNO, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), the forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1 /FVC, the FEV1 (% predicted), the demographic characteristics, the presence of complications and the smoking status. RESULTS: The patients with lung cancer had a significantly higher level of eNO than the healthy control subjects (33.85 ± 15.63 ppb, n = 163; 16.83 ± 4.17 ppb, n = 172; P < 0.01). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for eNO predicting airway inflammation in lung cancer subjects and healthy control subjects was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.904-0.961). In the lung cancer group, the eNO levels in the squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung cancer and lung carcinoid tumor groups were significantly different (P < 0.01). Lung cancerpatients with a predicted FEV1 % value <80% had a higher level of eNO than the patients with a predicted FEV1 % value ≥80%. CONCLUSIONS: The eNO levels in patients with lung cancer were higher than the normal level, especially in the patients with squamous cell carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. The differences in eNO among the lung cancer subtypes were statistically significant. Measuring eNO will be helpful in diagnosing airway inflammation in lung cancer and in the classification of lung cancer.
Authors: Abbas Salihi; Mohammed A Al-Naqshabandi; Zhikal Omar Khudhur; Zjwan Housein; Harmand A Hama; Ramyar M Abdullah; Bashdar Mahmud Hussen; Twana Alkasalias Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.423
Authors: Pierachille Santus; Maurizio Rizzi; Dejan Radovanovic; Andrea Airoldi; Andrea Cristiano; Rosalynn Conic; Stephen Petrou; Paolo Daniele Maria Pigatto; Nicola Bragazzi; Delia Colombo; Mohamad Goldust; Giovanni Damiani Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-09-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Paolo Cameli; Elena Bargagli; Laura Bergantini; Miriana d'Alessandro; Maria Pieroni; Giovanni A Fontana; Piersante Sestini; Rosa Metella Refini Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 5.923