| Literature DB >> 26933478 |
Zhila Torabizadeh1, Anahita Nosrati2, Shadi Tahvildari3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some recent studies reported human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2/neu) as a marker that can be used in immunological studies of colorectal carcinoma for predicting the prognosis and the treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the frequency of HER-2 expression in patients with colorectal cancer, and explore the relationship between clinicopathological prognostic factors and its expression based on immunohistochemical analysis. METHODS This study included 50 patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma who received surgery at Imam Khomeini Hospital affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. First, HER-2/neu protein expressions were detected by immunohistochemistry and then the data extracted from recorded files. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 60.2±13.9 years (range: 25-93 years). There was no significant relationship between size of tumor, age, sex, lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, differentiation, and stage of the disease with positive expression of HER-2 in this study. CONCLUSION No significant relationship between expression of HER-2 and clinicopathological prognostic factors was found in our study. Further comprehensive and prospective trial with standard method to evaluate the role of HER-2 expression among patients with colorectal cancer is needed.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Her-2/neu; Immunohistochemistry; Northern of Iran
Year: 2016 PMID: 26933478 PMCID: PMC4773079 DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.03
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Middle East J Dig Dis ISSN: 2008-5230
Characteristics of patients
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 50> | 16 | 32% | 0.692 |
| 50< | 34 | 68% | ||
| Gender | Male | 27 | 54% | 0.908 |
| Female | 23 | 46% | ||
| Treatment | Surgery | 8 | 16% | 0.446 |
| Surgery & chemotherapy | 33 | 66% | ||
| Surgery & radiotherapy | 9 | 18% | ||
| Differentiation | Well differentiated | 31 | 62% | 0.232 |
| Moderate differentiated | 14 | 28% | ||
| Poor differentiated | 5 | 10% | ||
| Location | Colon | 16 | 30% | 0.464 |
| Sigmoid | 9 | 10% | ||
| Rectum | 5 | 12% | ||
| Rectosigmoid | 6 | 26% | ||
| Cecum | 14 | 28% | ||
| Tumor size | Median | 4.6cm | 0.557 | |
| Range | 1-10cm | |||
| Depth of tumor | T1 | 9 | 18% | 0.941 |
| T2 | 7 | 14% | ||
| T3 | 28 | 56% | ||
| T4 | 6 | 12% | ||
| Stage | I | 6 | 12% | 0.868 |
| IIA | 21 | 42% | ||
| IIB | 3 | 6% | ||
| IIIA | 6 | 12% | ||
| IIIB | 13 | 26% | ||
| IIIC | 1 | 2% | ||
| Histological | Adenocarcinoma | 46 | 92% | 0.523 |
| Mucoid adenocarcinoma | 4 | 8% |
Metastasis and recurrence of tumor
|
|
|
|
| |
| LN metastasis | Absent | 31 | 62% | 0.465 |
| Present | 19 | 38% | ||
|
Distant | No | 27 | 54% | 0.797 |
| Yes | 13 | 26% | ||
| No response | 10 | 20% | ||
| Recurrence | Absent | 30 | 60% | 0.663 |
| Present | 10 | 20% | ||
| No response | 10 | 20% | ||
| Vascular | Absent | 29 | 58% | 0.726 |
| Present | 21 | 42% | ||
| Lymphatic | Absent | 47 | 94% | 0.803 |
| Present | 3 | 6% |
Fig. 1
Fig. 2